uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Processkrivande - en etablerad metod på gymnasiet?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Department of Scandinavian Languages.
2008 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)Alternative title
Process-oriented writing – an established method at upper secondary school (English)
Abstract [en]

From the 1980sprocess-oriented writing has been part of Swedish teachers’ work with their students’ writing.A distinguishing quality of the writing process is, except from the fact that it is similar to thewriting that takes place outside the educational sphere, its inner capacity to work as a tool ofsolution. As the degree of difficulties in the writing task increases, writing is no longer merelya question of a working process but also a strategic solution of writing problems.

The aim of this study is to investigate how much time students of upper secondary schoolspend on writing in class and what kind of texts they write. The aim is also to investigate thestudents’ acquisition of a strategic way of thinking in a process-oriented tuition when writingessays of a comprehensive length.

The material is based on questionnaires given to 260 students and their teachers in Swedishor biology classes. The study is carried through in ten different upper secondary schools at theend of year 2 in programs preparing for higher education.

The results of the study show that the students generally wrote up to a third of theirlessons. The students of Swedish spent most time on writing texts based on discussions whilestudents of biology wrote texts based on reports. The results also show that neither studentsnor teachers stated that they used the writing process totally when dealing with writing tasksof a comprehensive length. But according to the teachers’ answers, there existed someelements of the writing process. However, the use of a strategy to solve problems at differentphases, from preparation of the task to the final writing, was low. There were also only minordifferences in what way the writing task strategically was approached between students fromthe two subjects, but what yet was there, is probably due to traditions of handling the subject,Swedish or biology.

The conclusion of the study is that the students lack the use of the writing process as a toolwhen writing discursive texts. It seems as though students practised writing but withoutgetting a promotion in developing the art of writing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Uppsala universitet , 2008. , 49 p.
FUMS rapport, ISSN 0348-5838 ; 225
, Svenska i utveckling, 24
National Category
Specific Languages
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-148337ISRN: UU-FUMS-R-225-S-SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-148337DiVA: diva2:401995
Available from: 2011-03-04 Created: 2011-03-04 Last updated: 2011-03-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Department of Scandinavian Languages
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 730 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link