uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of two test methods for evaluation of forming tool materials
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Applied Materials Sciences.
Karlstad Universitet.
Karlstad Universitet.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Applied Materials Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Tribotest, ISSN 1354-4063, Vol. 14, no 3, 147-158 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Two test methods often used to simulate the tribological performance of forming tool materials are compared in this investigation through an evaluation of the friction and wear properties of four tool steels in dry sliding. One test (slider-on-flat-surface (SOFS)) utilises a vertical disc sliding on a horizontal flat test surface, and the other (load scanner (LS) tests) utilises two crossed cylindrical rods. The test conditions were selected as equal as possible for the two tests, and the following conclusions are made.Somewhat unexpectedly, the friction and wear results differed substantially between the two tests. The SOFS test showed a better potential to evaluate wear resistance since one test sample is in continuous contact with the other. The LS test can generate higher contact pressures since the two rods contact each other in an unworn condition throughout the whole test stroke.LS indicate that two hard and smooth tool steels tested against each other generally give low friction and good galling resistance. The two hard couples tested sustained the highest loads without any detectable surface damage. For the same combinations of hard steels, SOFS gave a higher friction due to the wear of the disc. The carbides in the disc material resist wear better than the matrix and will consequently wear the disc by abrasion, which adds to the friction.The above conclusions are drawn from a rather limited examination using only one set of test parameters. In fact, the two tests are both very flexible as to the way they can be used, and they both have advantages and limitations in tribological studies. They should rather be considered complementary than competitive.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 14, no 3, 147-158 p.
Keyword [en]
dry sliding, galling, tool steels
National Category
Materials Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-13282DOI: 10.1002/tt.54OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-13282DiVA: diva2:41052
Available from: 2008-01-22 Created: 2008-01-22 Last updated: 2011-05-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Hanson, MagnusHogmark, Sture

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hanson, MagnusHogmark, Sture
By organisation
Applied Materials Sciences
Materials Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 820 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf