uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What's Wrong with the Adequacy-Argument? A Pragmatic Diagnosis
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology, Studies in Faith and Ideologies, Philosophy of Religion. (Impact of religion)
2011 (English)In: Sophia - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics, ISSN 0038-1527, Vol. 50, no 1, 11-23 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

When confronted with the question of which philosophical conception of religion to consider most adequate, many philosophers appeal to what I call the adequacy-arguemnt: that we should prefer the one that looks most adequate from the perspective of religious believers. In this paper, I provide a critique of the adequacy-argument based on a pragmatic analysis of adequacy-judgments according to which reflective adequacy-judgments are forward-looking, and hence include considerations of the consequences of adopting different judgments as guides for conduct. It is this forward-looking character that is virtually absent with the current adequacy-debate. The major advantage of a pragmatic analysis if adequacy is itself forward-looking: it would enable philosophers of religion to play a more critical and constructive role vis-a-vis religious practices than presently.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Parkville, Australia: Dept. of Philosophy, University of Melbourne , 2011. Vol. 50, no 1, 11-23 p.
Keyword [en]
Dewey Pragmatism Adequacy-argument
National Category
Religious Studies
Research subject
Philosophy of Religion
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-153278DOI: 10.1007/s11841-009-0153-0OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-153278DiVA: diva2:415972
Projects
Impact of religion
Available from: 2011-05-10 Created: 2011-05-10 Last updated: 2016-10-17

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.springerlink.com/content/5301nq148u2352x4/fulltext.html

Authority records BETA

Zackariasson, Ulf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zackariasson, Ulf
By organisation
Philosophy of Religion
Religious Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 606 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf