What's Wrong with the Adequacy-Argument? A Pragmatic Diagnosis
2011 (English)In: Sophia - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, Metaphysical Theology and Ethics, ISSN 0038-1527, Vol. 50, no 1, 11-23 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
When confronted with the question of which philosophical conception of religion to consider most adequate, many philosophers appeal to what I call the adequacy-arguemnt: that we should prefer the one that looks most adequate from the perspective of religious believers. In this paper, I provide a critique of the adequacy-argument based on a pragmatic analysis of adequacy-judgments according to which reflective adequacy-judgments are forward-looking, and hence include considerations of the consequences of adopting different judgments as guides for conduct. It is this forward-looking character that is virtually absent with the current adequacy-debate. The major advantage of a pragmatic analysis if adequacy is itself forward-looking: it would enable philosophers of religion to play a more critical and constructive role vis-a-vis religious practices than presently.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Parkville, Australia: Dept. of Philosophy, University of Melbourne , 2011. Vol. 50, no 1, 11-23 p.
Dewey Pragmatism Adequacy-argument
Research subject Philosophy of Religion
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-153278DOI: 10.1007/s11841-009-0153-0OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-153278DiVA: diva2:415972
ProjectsImpact of religion