uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Ventilatory Protective Strategies during Thoracic Surgery Effects of Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver and Low-tidal Volume Ventilation on Lung Density Distribution
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Clinical Physiology.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Anesthesiology, ISSN 0003-3022, E-ISSN 1528-1175, Vol. 114, no 5, 1025-1035 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The increased tidal volume (V-T) applied to the ventilated lung during one-lung ventilation (OLV) enhances cyclic alveolar recruitment and mechanical stress. It is unknown whether alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) and reduced V-T may influence tidal recruitment and lung density. Therefore, the effects of ARM and OLV with different V-T on pulmonary gas/tissue distribution are examined. Methods: Eight anesthetized piglets were mechanically ventilated (V-T = 10 ml/kg). A defined ARM was applied to the whole lung (40 cm H2O for 10 s). Spiral computed tomographic lung scans were acquired before and after ARM. Thereafter, the lungs were separated with an endobronchial blocker. The pigs were randomized to receive OLV in the dependent lung with a V-T of either 5 or 10 ml/kg. Computed tomography was repeated during and after OLV. The voxels were categorized by density intervals (i.e., atelectasis, poorly aerated, normally aerated, or overaerated). Tidal recruitment was defined as the addition of gas to collapsed lung regions. Results: The dependent lung contained atelectatic (56 +/- 10 ml), poorly aerated (183 +/- 10 ml), and normally aerated (187 +/- 29 ml) regions before ARM. After ARM, lung volume and aeration increased (426 +/- 35 vs. 526 +/- 69 ml). Respiratory compliance enhanced, and tidal recruitment decreased(95% vs. 79% of the whole end-expiratory lung volume). OLV with 10 ml/kg further increased aeration (atelectasis, 15 +/- 2 ml; poorly aerated, 94 +/- 24 ml; normally aerated, 580 +/- 98 ml) and tidal recruitment (81% of the dependent lung). OLV with 5 ml/kg did not affect tidal recruitment or lung density distribution. (Data are given as mean +/- SD.) Conclusions: The ARM improves aeration and respiratory mechanics. In contrast to OLV with high V-T, OLV with reduced V-T does not reinforce tidal recruitment, indicating decreased mechanical stress.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 114, no 5, 1025-1035 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-153650DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182164356ISI: 000289980200007PubMedID: 21436678OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-153650DiVA: diva2:417392
Available from: 2011-05-17 Created: 2011-05-17 Last updated: 2011-05-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Clinical Physiology
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 178 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link