uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Beyond conventional stroke guidelines: setting priorities
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Stroke, ISSN 0039-2499, E-ISSN 1524-4628, Vol. 38, no 7, 2185-2190 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and Purpose— Priorities in the care of stroke patients are often intuitive. An open and translucent priority-setting procedure would benefit patients, professionals, and decision-makers. Prioritization is an innovative part of the new Swedish national stroke guidelines.

Methods— Working groups identified diagnostic procedures, interventions and therapies in stroke care, assessed each one according to severity (needs), effect of action, level of scientific evidence and cost-effectiveness. The items were then ranked into priority groups from 1 (highest) to 10 (lowest). Procedures lacking evidence for routine clinical use were also identified (and entered a do-not-do list), as well as procedures in research and development. Resource allocations resulting from the priority-setting process were identified.

Results— Of 102 core procedures identified, 50 were assigned to high-priority groups (1–3), 29 to moderate priority groups (4–7) and 23 to low priority groups (8–10). Almost a quarter were graded 8 to 10, indicating that they may not necessarily be applied if resources are scarce. Twenty-eight procedures were assigned to the do-not-do list and 16 to the research and development list.

Conclusions— In stroke services, it is possible to identify not only diagnostic procedures and interventions with high priority, but also a considerable number of items used today that have low priority or should not be used at all. Strict adherence to the guidelines would result in a substantial reallocation of resources from low-priority to high-priority areas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 38, no 7, 2185-2190 p.
Keyword [en]
cost analysis, health priorities, needs assessment, practice guidelines, stroke services
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-14679DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.481457ISI: 000247513300047OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-14679DiVA: diva2:42450
Available from: 2008-01-31 Created: 2008-01-31 Last updated: 2011-04-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Terént, Andreas
By organisation
Department of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 158 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link