uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Patient-assessed outcomes in Swedish and Egyptian men undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution--a prospective comparative study
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Urology.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Urology, ISSN 0090-4295, E-ISSN 1527-9995, Vol. 70, no 6, 1086-1090 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To compare two patient populations with assumed cultural differences undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic bladder substitution to determine whether these translate into differences in the answers to self-report instruments. Methods: The questionnaires Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder Cancer (FACT-BL), consisting of a general version (FACT-G) and a bladder cancer specific module, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were used preoperatively and 3 and 12 months postoperatively to assess patient well-being, urologic symptoms, depression, and anxiety in 29 and 32 Swedish and Egyptian male patients, respectively. Results: Significant differences were found between the two groups. Higher FACT-G scores (ie, better outcomes) were obtained in the Swedish patients, both preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, but not after 12 months. Differences were also seen in the urogenital assessment provided by the FACT-BL module. HADS revealed more depression among the Egyptian patients throughout the study period. Also, anxiety was more common preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in the Egyptian patients, but not after 12 months. Conclusions: Swedish men scored better than Egyptian men on the FACT-BL and HADS, although the latter improved with time after surgery. These results show that patient-assessed outcomes differ in patients from different sociocultural backgrounds. This should be recognized when analyzing results from comparative studies. Also, the use of culture-fair instruments is important when assessing patients with different sociocultural backgrounds.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 70, no 6, 1086-1090 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-15347DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.071ISI: 000253194400014PubMedID: 18158023OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-15347DiVA: diva2:43118
Available from: 2008-02-11 Created: 2008-02-11 Last updated: 2011-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 153 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link