uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Pharmacists' changing views of their supplementary prescribing authority.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy.
2007 (English)In: Pharmacy World & Science, ISSN 0928-1231, E-ISSN 1573-739X, Vol. 29, no 6, 628-634 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective  To investigate the views and experiences of pharmacists in England before and after they registered as supplementary prescribers. Method  Eight pharmacists were recruited from training courses; seven from secondary care and one from primary care and interviewed during training and again after registration. In the first interviews, topics included previous experience, views on current roles, responsibilities and accountability for prescribing and how these might change. In the second interviews, the pharmacists discussed how these had actually changed after gaining supplementary prescribing authority, how their role worked in practice and how they saw it developing in the future. Main outcome measure  Descriptions of anticipated and actual changes in their roles, responsibilities and accountability before and after registration as supplementary prescribers Results  The pharmacists anticipated that training would legitimise their current ‘informal’ prescribing practices, with increased legal responsibility and accountability, but experienced many procedural delays in implementing their new role. Pharmacists who were already heavily involved with prescribing were more likely to work as prescribers, but not necessarily within the clinical management plan framework. The desire to maintain the efficiency of their existing clinical services impacted negatively on the pharmacists’ ability or willingness to prescribe in this legally approved manner. Conclusion  Clear and realistic expectations need to be set by the pharmacists as to what is achievable and greater attention needs to be paid to minimising delays between the end of training and the beginning of practice, to minimise reduction in motivation and redeployment of staff.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 29, no 6, 628-634 p.
Keyword [en]
England, Humans, Pharmacists, Prescriptions; Drug, Professional Autonomy, Professional Role
National Category
Pharmaceutical Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-15522DOI: 10.1007/s11096-007-9114-2PubMedID: 17380422OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-15522DiVA: diva2:43293
Available from: 2008-02-18 Created: 2008-02-18 Last updated: 2010-03-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=17380422&dopt=Citation

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tully, Mary
By organisation
Department of Pharmacy
In the same journal
Pharmacy World & Science
Pharmaceutical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 157 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link