uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Mercury substitution priority working list -: An input to global considerations on mercury management.
Uppsala University, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Earth Sciences, Department of Earth Sciences. LUVAL. (Hylander)
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)Report (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

Mercury (Hg) is among our most serious health and environmental hazards. Anthropogenic emissions of Hg result in direct human exposure and a build-up in the global environment and subsequent transfer to humans via consumed fish. The supply chain from virgin mined Hg over Hgadded products to final disposal is long. While the adverse environmental impacts are globally acknowledged, the understanding and mitigation of the problem is delayed, maybe because consumers and other public and private stakeholders are not always aware of the risks, and because environmental costs are, generally, not considered in the market price for devices containing Hg. To reduce or eliminate the risks, Hg substitution is one viable option. Here we present an input to global considerations on mercury management by presenting a mercury substitution priority working list; or: An identification of the least essential mercury uses. This may be used as inspiration for reducing intentional mercury uses globally, if politically desirable, by furnishing the list to stakeholders globally as an input to constructive discussions currently undertaken under auspices of UNEP towards reducing Hg releases. The list includes all identified intentional uses of Hg, the availability of relevant alternatives, and proposed Hg substitution order, and major challenges ahead.

No doubt, implementation of substitution of mercury in developing countries worldwide will need careful consideration of the potential impacts of mercury substitution, and probably substantial technical and financial support in some areas. However, the results of this study illustrate that significant mercury reductions may indeed be within reach, and that a reduction process involving a step-wise substitution approach taking major socio-economic challenges into consideration could be a way forward.

Almost two thirds, or 43 out of the 72 identified uses of mercury, are deemed readily substitutable because alternatives are compatible and even dominate the market in many countries already. Many of these mercury uses are already used in marginal amounts in the global perspective, and restrictions of further input of these to society may therefore perhaps have relatively small economical consequences in the present situation.

Some readily substitutable mercury uses do however represent significant inputs of mercury to society, which could be avoided without major technical difficulties (e. g. mercury-oxide batteries, certain other regionally sold old-type primary batteries and thermostats, and manometers). Other uses have alternatives available or well on the way, but face institutional (or structural), social or technical challenges indicating a need for longer phase-out periods. These are for example hospital and laboratory equipment, which use is often required in quite rigid standards, which take 8 Mercury Substition time to change. Finally, a limited number of Hg uses (10 out of 72 identified) face substantial, but likely not insurmountable, challenges for mercury substitution or phase-out. In most cases, the socio-economic challenges are the main reasons; examples are small scale gold mining, everyman’s fluorescent energy-saving lights, and dental amalgam.

In short, the results of our assessment indicate that:

• Many mercury uses may today be readily eliminated, if politically desired.

• Global mercury demand may be reduced significantly by substitution of the least essential uses.

• Applying a prioritized phase-out work list may help focusing on the main problems in mercury reductions and thereby securing a cost effective phase-out process.

Based on these findings we recommend that:

A prioritised phase-out work list for intentional mercury uses is discussed and developed further in international cooperation, for example as part of the Open-ended Working Group considering legal and other initiatives on mercury established under the auspices of the United Nation’s Environment Programme (UNEP). This could serve:

• As a valuable tool in mutual communication and discussion of possible global mercury reductions

• As a tool for a step-wise reduction development, if desired politically

• As part of forming a common vision for global mercury reductions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark. , 2007. , 36 + app. p.
, TemaNord 2007:541., 2007:541.
Keyword [en]
mercury usage, mercury-free alternatives
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-17018OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-17018DiVA: diva2:44789
Available from: 2008-06-13 Created: 2008-06-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

By organisation
Department of Earth SciencesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 117 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link