uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prognostic superiority of daytime ambulatory over conventional blood pressure in four populations: a meta-analysis of 7,030 individuals
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Journal of Hypertension, ISSN 0263-6352, E-ISSN 1473-5598, Vol. 25, no 8, 1554-1564 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective To investigate the multivariate-adjusted predictive value of systolic and diastolic blood pressures on conventional (CBP) and daytime (10-20h) ambulatory (ABP) measurement. Methods We randomly recruited 7030 subjects (mean age 56.2 years; 44.8% women) from populations in Belgium, Denmark, Japan and Sweden. We constructed the International Database on Ambulatory blood pressure and Cardiovascular Outcomes. Results During follow-up (median = 9.5 years), 932 subjects died. Neither CBP nor ABP predicted total mortality, of which 60.9% was due to noncardiovascular causes. The incidence of fatal combined with nonfatal cardiovascular events amounted to 863 (228 deaths, 326 strokes and 309 cardiac events). In multivariate-adjusted continuous analyses, both CBP and ABP predicted cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, cardiac and coronary events. However, in fully-adjusted models, including both CBP and ABP, CBP lost its predictive value (P>0.052), whereas systolic and diastolic ABP retained their prognostic significance (P< 0.007) with the exception of diastolic ABP as predictor of cardiac and coronary events (P>0.21). In adjusted categorical analyses, normotension was the referent group (CBP<140/90 mmHg and ABP<135/ 85 mmHg). Adjusted hazard ratios for all cardiovascular events were 1.22 [95% confidence interval (Cl) = 0.96-1.53; P=0.09] for white-coat hypertension (≥140/90 and <135/85 mmHg); 1.62 (95% Cl = 1.35-1.96; P< 0.0001) for masked hypertension (<140/90 and ≥ 135/85 mmHg); and 1.80 (95% Cl = 1.59-2.03; P<0.0001) for sustained hypertension (≥140/90 and ≥135/85 mmHg). Conclusions ABP is superior to CBP in predicting cardiovascular events, but not total and noncardiovascular mortality. Cardiovascular risk gradually increases from normotension over white-coat and masked hypertension to sustained hypertension.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 25, no 8, 1554-1564 p.
Keyword [en]
Ambulatory blood pressure, Cardiovascular disease, Epidemiology, Masked hypertension, White-coat hypertension
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-17245DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3281c49da5ISI: 000248414400004PubMedID: 17620947OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-17245DiVA: diva2:45016
Available from: 2008-06-18 Created: 2008-06-18 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Caring SciencesDepartment of Medical Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Hypertension
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 378 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf