uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: Annals of Surgery, ISSN 0003-4932, E-ISSN 1528-1140, Vol. 253, no 4, 711-719 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To assess local recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-predicted good prognosis tumors treated by surgery alone.

BACKGROUND: The MERCURY study reported that high-resolution MRI can accurately stage rectal cancer. The routine policy in most centers involved in the MERCURY study was primary surgery alone in MRI-predicted stage II or less and in MRI "good prognosis" stage III with selective avoidance of neoadjuvant therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on all patients included in the MERCURY study who were staged as MRI-defined "good" prognosis tumors. "Good" prognosis included MRI-predicted safe circumferential resection margins, with MRI-predicted T2/T3a/T3b (less than 5 mm spread from muscularis propria), regardless of MRI N stage. None received preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy. Overall survival, disease-free survival, and local recurrence were calculated.

RESULTS: Of 374 patients followed up in the MERCURY study, 122 (33%) were defined as "good prognosis" stage III or less on MRI. Overall and disease-free survival for all patients with MRI "good prognosis" stage I, II and III disease at 5 years was 68% and 85%, respectively. The local recurrence rate for this series of patients predicted to have a good prognosis tumor on MRI was 3%.

CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative identification of good prognosis tumors using MRI will allow stratification of patients and better targeting of preoperative therapy. This study confirms the ability of MRI to select patients who are likely to have a good outcome with primary surgery alone.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 253, no 4, 711-719 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-160758DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31820b8d52PubMedID: 21475011OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-160758DiVA: diva2:452626
Michael R. Torkzad, Institutionen för radiologi, onkologi och strålningsvetenskap; Enheten för radiologi, Uppsala university contributed to this study. Available from: 2011-10-31 Created: 2011-10-31 Last updated: 2012-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Torkzad, Michael R.
By organisation
In the same journal
Annals of Surgery
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 181 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link