uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Parental experiences and preferences regarding the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Women's and Children's Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4590-4957
Department of Paediatrics, County Hospital Ryhov, Jönköping, Sweden.
Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Pediatric Uro-Nephrologic Center, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, ISSN 0036-5599, E-ISSN 1651-2065, Vol. 46, no 1, 26-30 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective.

Dilating vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) has been linked to febrile urinary tract infection (UTI) and renal scarring. It is unclear, however, whether children with reflux should be treated surgically or medically, or just kept under close surveillance with prompt treatment of UTIs. This lack of evidence makes parental preferences a crucial factor in the choice of therapy. The Swedish Reflux Trial was set up to compare the three treatment alternatives prospectively. This paper focuses on parental experience and satisfaction after completing the trial.

Material and methods.

A group of 203 children aged 12-24 months with reflux grade III or IV were randomly assigned to antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 69), surveillance (n = 68) or endoscopic injection treatment (n = 66) and followed closely for 2 years. Afterwards, the families were interviewed by an investigator not involved in the care of the children about their experience of the study.

Results.

Parental satisfaction with the treatment given was high, with 53% scoring 5 and 35% 4 on a five-grade scale, with no difference between the three groups (p = 0.5). Recurrence of febrile UTI or new kidney scarring did not influence parental satisfaction. Even though the satisfaction was high regardless of therapy, parents of children in the prophylaxis group more often than others would have chosen another treatment if given a choice.

Conclusions.

As far as parental satisfaction and preferences are concerned, antibiotic prophylaxis, surveillance and injection treatment are equivalent treatment strategies in children with VUR.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 46, no 1, 26-30 p.
National Category
Pediatrics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-164110DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2011.621144ISI: 000299125800006PubMedID: 22008041OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-164110DiVA: diva2:466481
Available from: 2011-12-16 Created: 2011-12-16 Last updated: 2017-12-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Nevéus, Tryggve

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nevéus, Tryggve
By organisation
Department of Women's and Children's Health
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Pediatrics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 405 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf