uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Understanding neighbourhood effects: selection bias and residential mobility
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
Delft University of Technology, Delft.
2011 (English)In: Neighbourhood Effects Research: New Perspectives / [ed] Maarten van Ham, David Manley, Nick Bailey, Ludi Simpson, Duncan Maclennan, Dordrecht ;: Springer, 2011, 79-100 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dordrecht ;: Springer, 2011. 79-100 p.
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-165132ISBN: 94-007-2308-3OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-165132DiVA: diva2:471934
Available from: 2012-01-03 Created: 2012-01-03 Last updated: 2016-04-22Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Residential Mobility and Neighbourhood Effects: A Holistic Approach
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Residential Mobility and Neighbourhood Effects: A Holistic Approach
2011 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The number of studies estimating neighbourhood effects has increased rapidly during the last two decades. Although results from these studies vary, a majority find at least small effects. But to what extent can we trust these estimates? Neighbourhood effect studies face many serious methodological challenges, of which some are related to the fact that people move. The mobility of individuals may cause neighbourhoods to change over time, result in exposure times that are too short and seriously bias estimates. These methodological problems have not been given enough attention in the neighbourhood effect literature: no study controls for them all, and implications of mobility are rarely included in theoretical discussions of neighbourhood effects.

In a comprehensive summary and five different papers, I argue that the two scholarly fields of residential mobility and neighbourhood effect studies are intrinsically connected and that any arbitrary separation between the two is both conceptually problematic and risks leading to erroneous conclusions. Studies of neighbourhood effects must address the problems caused by mobility, before it can be convincingly argued that results actually show neighbourhood effects. To do this, longitudinal data are necessary. Furthermore, the connection between the two fields may also have implications for studies of residential mobility.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2011. i-vii, 52 p.
Geografiska regionstudier, ISSN 0431-2023 ; 88
neighbourhood effect, residential mobility, selection, method, bias
National Category
Social Sciences Human Geography
Research subject
Social and Economic Geography
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-160428 (URN)978-91-506-2246-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2011-12-09, Universitetshuset, sal IV, Biskopsgatan 3, Uppsala, 10:15 (English)
Available from: 2011-11-18 Created: 2011-10-24 Last updated: 2016-04-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hedman, Lina
By organisation
Institute for Housing and Urban Research
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 272 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link