uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Pathologic Downstaging Is a Surrogate Marker for Efficacy and Increased Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Radical Cystectomy for Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Bladder Cancer
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: European Urology, ISSN 0302-2838, E-ISSN 1873-7560, Vol. 61, no 6, 1229-1238 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Characterising responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is important to minimise overtreatment and the unnecessary delay of definitive treatment of urothelial urinary bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of NAC on tumour downstaging and overall survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 449 patients from the randomised prospective Nordic Cystectomy Trials 1 and 2 were analysed retrospectively. Eligible patients were defined as T2-T4aNXM0 preoperatively and pT0-pT4aN0-N+M0 postoperatively. The median follow-up time was 5 yr.

INTERVENTION: The experimental arm consisted of cisplatin-based NAC; the control arm consisted of cystectomy only.

MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was tumour downstaging defined as pathologic TNM less than clinical TNM. Different downstaging thresholds were applied: complete downstaging (CD) (pT0N0), noninvasive downstaging (NID) (pT0/pTis/pTaN0), and organ confinement (OC) (≤pT3aN0). Downstaging rates and nodal status were compared between the study arms using the chi-square test. Secondary outcome was overall survival (OS) stratified by treatment arm, downstaging categories, and clinical stages, analysed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The following covariates were tested as prognostic factors in univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox regression method: age, sex, clinical stage, pN status, NAC, CD, NID, and OC.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Downstaging rates increased significantly in the NAC arm independent of the downstaging threshold. The impact was more prominent in clinical T3 tumours, with a near threefold increase in CD tumours. The combination of CD and NAC showed an absolute risk reduction of 31.1% in OS at 5 yr compared with CD controls. The combination of NAC and CD revealed a hazard ratio of 0.32 compared with 1.0 for the combination of no NAC and no CD. Limitations were the retrospective approach and uncertain clinical TNM staging.

CONCLUSIONS: Survival benefits of NAC are reflected in downstaging of the primary tumour. Chemo-induced downstaging might be a potential surrogate marker for OS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 61, no 6, 1229-1238 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-165987DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.010ISI: 000303458000039PubMedID: 22189383OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-165987DiVA: diva2:475017
Available from: 2012-01-10 Created: 2012-01-10 Last updated: 2012-05-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Malmström, Per-Uno
By organisation
In the same journal
European Urology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 273 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link