uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Comparison of buccal and blood-derived canine DNA, either native or whole genome amplified, for array-based genome-wide association studies
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology. Uppsala University, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: BMC Research Notes, ISSN 1756-0500, Vol. 4, 226- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


The availability of array-based genotyping platforms for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for the canine genome has expanded the opportunities to undertake genome-wide association (GWA) studies to identify the genetic basis for Mendelian and complex traits. Whole blood as the source of high quality DNA is undisputed but often proves impractical for collection of the large numbers of samples necessary to discover the loci underlying complex traits. Further, many countries prohibit the collection of blood from dogs unless medically necessary thereby restricting access to critical control samples from healthy dogs. Alternate sources of DNA, typically from buccal cytobrush extractions, while convenient, have been suggested to have low yield and perform poorly in GWA. Yet buccal cytobrushes provide a cost-effective means of collecting DNA, are readily accepted by dog owners, and represent a large resource base in many canine genetics laboratories. To increase the DNA quantities, whole genome amplification (WGA) can be performed. Thus, the present study assessed the utility of buccal-derived DNA as well as whole genome amplification in comparison to blood samples for use on the most recent iteration of the canine HD SNP array (Illumina).


In both buccal and blood samples, whether whole genome amplified or not, 97% of the samples had SNP call rates in excess of 80% indicating that the vast majority of the SNPs would be suitable to perform association studies regardless of the DNA source. Similarly, there were no significant differences in marker intensity measurements between buccal and blood samples for copy number variations (CNV) analysis.


All DNA samples assayed, buccal or blood, native or whole genome amplified, are appropriate for use in array-based genome-wide association studies. The concordance between subsets of dogs for which both buccal and blood samples, or those samples whole genome amplified, was shown to average >99%. Thus, the two DNA sources were comparable in the generation of SNP genotypes and intensity values to estimate structural variation indicating the utility for the use of buccal cytobrush samples and the reliability of whole genome amplification for genome-wide association and CNV studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 4, 226- p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-169169DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-226PubMedID: 21718521OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-169169DiVA: diva2:505251
Available from: 2012-02-23 Created: 2012-02-23 Last updated: 2012-06-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindblad-Toh, Kerstin
By organisation
Department of Medical Biochemistry and MicrobiologyScience for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab
In the same journal
BMC Research Notes
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 262 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link