uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Vagueness, Incomparability, and the Collapsing Principle
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
2013 (English)In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, ISSN 1386-2820, E-ISSN 1572-8447, Vol. 16, no 3, 449-463 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

John Broome has argued that incomparability and vagueness cannot coexist in a given betterness order. His argument essentially hinges on an assumption he calls the 'collapsing principle'. In an earlier article I criticized this principle, but Broome has recently expressed doubts about the cogency of my criticism. Moreover, Cristian Constantinescu has defended Broome's view from my objection. In this paper, I present further arguments against the collapsing principle, and try to show that Constantinescu's defence of Broome's position fails.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Publishing Company, 2013. Vol. 16, no 3, 449-463 p.
National Category
Research subject
Practical Philosophy
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-171711DOI: 10.1007/s10677-012-9352-9ISI: 000319997800002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-171711DiVA: diva2:512113
Available from: 2012-03-26 Created: 2012-03-26 Last updated: 2013-07-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Carlson, Erik
By organisation
Ethics and Social Philosophy
In the same journal
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 202 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link