uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Identical, But Still Different: On Artistic Appropriation in Visual Art
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Aesthetics.
2012 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In this dissertation about artistic appropriation I acknowledge that something indeed has happened in art. Visual art does not have to look in any special way anymore, or have historically validated content that can be visually grasped. Within this precondition artistic appropriation is situated. An artistic appropriation artwork is visually identical to a pre-existing artwork, but is still an independent artwork that is about something other than what the pre-existing artwork is about.The dissertation ties into, and separates itself from, two discussions: On the one hand, a discussion about the difference between a mere thing and an artwork that looks exactly like it. Duchamp’s Fountain is an example; it looks exactly like an ordinary urinal. On the other, the various ways artists have used pre-existing art throughout history to make new art. One historical example is the paraphrase. Previously, there has been no sufficient discussion about artists who make artworks that look exactly like pre-existing artworks and what this artistic practice says about the identity of art. I argue that artistic appropriation unveils the constitution of the artwork. In chapter one, a definition of artistic appropriation is introduced. Then there follows a discussion regarding previous research about appropriation and closely related concepts like adaptation and intertextuality. In chapter two, artistic appropriation is situated in relation to the historical avant-garde and later changes that made conceptual art possible. Present is also a discussion about how artistic appropriation both challenges and affirms traditional notions in art, such as originality, authorship and creativity. In chapter three there is a discussion about three artistic appropriators and their work: The artists are Elaine Sturtevant, Sherrie Levine and Michael Mandiberg. They must be understood in relation to a different set of backgrounds, which means that their artworks emerge differently.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Department of Philosophy , 2012. , 234 p.
Keyword [en]
Visual art, artistic appropriation, intention, context, meta-art, conceptual art, art theory, philosophy of art, Danto, Sturtevant, Levine, Mandiberg.
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-171900ISBN: 978-91-506-2281-2OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-171900DiVA: diva2:512771
Public defence
2012-05-19, Universitetshuset Sal 4, Biskopsgatan 3, Uppsala, 10:15 (Swedish)
Available from: 2012-04-26 Created: 2012-03-28 Last updated: 2012-04-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekholm, Rikard
By organisation

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1114 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link