uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Diagnosis-dependent misclassification of infections using administrative data variably affected incidence and mortality estimates in ICU patients
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Infectious Diseases.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Orthopaedics. (Ortopedi)
2007 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, ISSN 0895-4356, E-ISSN 1878-5921, Vol. 60, no 2, 155-162 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of hospital discharge diagnoses in identifying severe infections among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and estimate the impact of misclassification on incidence and 1-year mortality. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Sepsis, pneumonia, and central nervous system (CNS) infections among 7,615 ICU admissions were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnoses from the Swedish hospital discharge register (HDR). Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were calculated using ICU database diagnoses as reference standard, with inclusion in sepsis trials (IST) as secondary reference for sepsis. RESULTS: CNS infections were accurately captured (sensitivity 95.4% [confidence interval (CI)=86.8-100] and specificity 99.6% [CI=99.4-99.8]). Community-acquired sepsis (sensitivity 51.1% [CI=41.0-61.2] and specificity 99.4% [CI=99.2-99.6]) and primary pneumonia (sensitivity 38.2% [CI=31.2-45.2] and specificity 98.6% [CI=98.2-99.0]) were more accurately detected than sepsis and pneumonia in general. One-year mortality was accurately estimated for primary pneumonia but underestimated for community-acquired sepsis. However, there were only small differences in sensitivity and specificity between HDR and ICU data in the ability to identify IST. ICD-9 appeared more accurate for sepsis, whereas ICD-10 was more accurate for pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Accuracy of hospital discharge diagnoses varied depending on diagnosis and case definition. The pattern of misclassification makes estimates of relative risk more accurate than estimates of absolute risk.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 60, no 2, 155-162 p.
Keyword [en]
Cause of Death, Central Nervous System Infections/*classification/diagnosis/mortality, Classification, Community-Acquired Infections/*classification/diagnosis/mortality, Cross Infection/classification/diagnosis/mortality, Databases; Factual, Hospital Mortality, Hospital Records, Humans, Incidence, Intensive Care Units, Likelihood Functions, Patient Discharge/*statistics & numerical data, Pneumonia/*classification/diagnosis/mortality, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sepsis/*classification/diagnosis/mortality, Sweden
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-23798DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.05.013ISI: 000243601300007PubMedID: 17208121OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-23798DiVA: diva2:51572
Available from: 2008-05-31 Created: 2008-05-31 Last updated: 2011-02-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed&cmd=Retrieve&list_uids=17208121&dopt=Citation

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gedeborg, RolfFurebring, MiaMichaëlsson, Karl
By organisation
Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareInfectious DiseasesOrthopaedics
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 186 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link