uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Model fitting of volumetric capnograms improves calculations of airway dead space and slope of phase III
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, ISSN 1387-1307, E-ISSN 1573-2614, Vol. 23, no 4, 197-206 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

This study assessed the performance of a Functional Approximation based on a Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm (FA-LMA) to calculate airway dead space (VDaw) and the slope of phase III (S III) from capnograms.

Methods

We performed mathematical simulations to test the effect of noises on the calculation of VDaw and S III. Data from ten mechanically ventilated patients at 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O of PEEP were also studied. FA-LMA was compared with the traditional Fowler’s method (FM).

Results

Simulations showed that: (1) The FM determined VDaw with accuracy only if the capnogram approximated a symmetrical curve (S III = 0). When capnograms became asymmetrical (S III > 0), the FM underestimated VDaw (−3.1% to −0.9%). (2) When adding noises on 800 capnograms, VDaw was underestimated whenever the FM was used thereby creating a bias between −5.54 and −1.28 ml at standard deviations (SD) of 0.1–1.8 ml (P < 0.0001). FA-LMA calculations of VDaw were close to the simulated values with the bias ranging from −0.21 to 0.16 ml at SD from 0.1 to 0.4 ml. The FM overestimated S III and showed more bias (0.0041–0.0078 mmHg/ml, P < 0.0001) than the FA-LMA (0.0002–0.0030 mmHg/ml). When calculating VDaw from patients, variability was less with the FA-LMA leading to mean variation coefficients of 0.0102, 0.0111 and 0.0123 compared to the FM (0.0243, 0.0247 and 0.0262, P < 0.001) for 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O of PEEP, respectively. The FA-LMA also showed less variability in S III with mean variation coefficients of 0.0739, 0.0662 and 0.0730 compared to the FM (0.1379, 0.1208 and 0.1246, P < 0.001) for 0, 5 and 10 cmH2O of PEEP, respectively.

Conclusions

The Functional Approxi- mation based on a Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm showed less bias and dispersion compared to the traditional Fowler’s method when calculating VDaw and S III.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 23, no 4, 197-206 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-176049DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9182-zPubMedID: 19517259OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-176049DiVA: diva2:534070
Available from: 2012-06-15 Created: 2012-06-15 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
In the same journal
Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 383 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf