uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Predefined headings in a multiprofessional electronic health record system
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences. (Funktionshinder och habilitering)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences. (Funktionshinder och habilitering)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences. (Funktionshinder och habilitering)
2012 (English)In: JAMIA Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, ISSN 1067-5027, E-ISSN 1527-974X, Vol. 19, no 6, 1032-1038 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundApplying multiprofessional electronic health records (EHRs) is expected to improve the quality of patient care and patient safety. Both EHR systems and system users depend on semantic interoperability to function efficiently. A shared clinical terminology comprising unambiguous terms is required for semantic interoperability. Empirical studies of clinical terminology, such as predefined headings, in EHR systems are scarce and limited to one profession or one clinical specialty.ObjectiveTo study predefined headings applied by users in a Swedish multiprofessional EHR system.Materials and methodsThis was a descriptive study of predefined headings (n=3596) applied by 5509 users in a Swedish multiprofessional EHR system. The predefined headings were classified into four term and word categories.ResultsLess than half of the predefined headings were shared by two or more professional groups. All eight professionals groups shared 1.7% of the predefined headings. The distribution of predefined headings across categories yielded two-thirds "terms for special purposes" and "specialist terms" and one-third "common words" and "unclassified headings".DiscussionThe indicated presence of profession-specific predefined headings and the conflict between ambiguity and comprehension of terms and words used as headings are discussed.ConclusionsThe predefined headings in the multiprofessional EHR system studied did not constitute a joint language for specific purposes. The improvement of the quality and usability of multiprofessional EHR systems requires attention.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 19, no 6, 1032-1038 p.
Keyword [en]
Medical records, Health occupations, Terminology, Documentation
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Medical Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-178044DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000855ISI: 000310408500017PubMedID: 22744962OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-178044DiVA: diva2:541826
Available from: 2012-07-24 Created: 2012-07-24 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Predefined Headings in a Multi-professional Electronic Health Record: Professionals’ Application, Aspects of Health and Health Care and Correspondence to Legal Requirements
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Predefined Headings in a Multi-professional Electronic Health Record: Professionals’ Application, Aspects of Health and Health Care and Correspondence to Legal Requirements
2014 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate predefined headings in a Swedish county council multi-professional EHR system in terms of their shared application, what aspects of health and health care they reflected, and their correspondence to legal requirements. An analysis of 3 596 predefined headings, applied to 20 398 104 occasions by eight professional groups, was conducted. Less than 2% of the predefined headings were applied by all eight professional groups, whereas 60% were not shared at all between the professional groups. A classification of the predefined headings revealed that 13% were “Specialist terms”, which were the least ambiguous predefined headings, 46% were “Terms for specific purposes”, which are less ambiguous than the “Common words” (28%), which were the most ambiguous predefined headings according to the sociolinguistic method employed. The remaining predefined headings (13%) were sorted into “Unclassified headings”. A qualitative content analysis of the predefined headings yielded 23 subcategories grouped into five categories: Description of the patient, Health care process, Resources employed, Administrative documentation, and Development and research. A comparison of the 23 subcategories to the Patient Data Act showed, first, that 15 of 23 subcategories corresponded to four legal requirements, second, that there were legal requirements with a focus on patient rights that were not being met, and third, that there were eight subcategories of predefined headings that could not be attributed to the legal provisions of the Patient Data Act. In conclusion, the proportion of shared predefined headings in the EHRs was limited. The predefined headings in the multi-professional EHRs did not constitute a joint language for specific purposes. A meaningful structure comprising categories and subcategories of different aspects of health and health care as reflected in the applied predefined headings was identified. The structure reflected a wide range of health and health care. No subcategory corresponded to the three legal requirements concerning patient rights. Future research should include professionals’ and patients’ understanding of predefined headings, the correspondence of documented notes to predefined headings and how the documentation in the EHR has had an impact on patient safety.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Uppsala universitet, 2014. 30 p.
Keyword
Electronic health records, Headings, Patient Data Act, Health care professionals
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Research subject
Medical Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-246853 (URN)
Presentation
2014-10-24, Boströmsalen, Uppsala universitet, BMC, Husargatan 3, Uppsala, 09:00 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-03-12 Created: 2015-03-11 Last updated: 2015-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Terner, AnnikaLindstedt, HelenaSonnander, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Terner, AnnikaLindstedt, HelenaSonnander, Karin
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences
In the same journal
JAMIA Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 702 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf