uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Past and Future Non-Existence
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ethics and Social Philosophy.
2012 (English)In: Journal of Ethics, ISSN 1382-4554, E-ISSN 1572-8609, Vol. 17, 51-64 p.Article, book review (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

According to the “deprivation approach,” a person’s death is bad for her to the extent that it deprives her of goods. This approach faces the Lucretian problem that prenatal non-existence deprives us of goods just as much as death does, but does not seem bad at all. The two most prominent responses to this challenge—one of which is provided by Frederik Kaufman (inspired by Thomas Nagel) and the other by Anthony Brueckner and John Martin Fischer—claim that prenatal non-existence is relevantly different from death. This paper criticizes these responses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 17, 51-64 p.
Keyword [en]
Bias towards the future; Evil of death; Deprivation approach; Prenatal non-existence; Symmetry argument
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-179302DOI: 10.1007/s10892-012-9137-3OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-179302DiVA: diva2:544127
Available from: 2012-08-13 Created: 2012-08-13 Last updated: 2016-07-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Jens
By organisation
Ethics and Social Philosophy
In the same journal
Journal of Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 153 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link