uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Supporting the opposition or the ruling party: Stark choices in East Africa
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
2011 (English)In: Democratization, ISSN 1351-0347, E-ISSN 1743-890X, Vol. 18, no 5, 1168-1192 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Citizens of the three East African countries Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda differ much in their expressed support for the political opposition and in their trust in the ruling political institutions of the president, the electoral commission and the ruling party. Citizens in Uganda and Kenya have become more sceptical towards their ruling institutions, while citizens in Tanzania are still very trusting and express much stronger deferential values than is the case in the other two countries, even though Tanzanians have experienced less of democratic changes. How can this difference be explained, and to what extent is democracy being institutionalized in the three countries? Using Afrobarometer data it is shown that democratic constitutional values are an important reason for supporting the opposition in Kenya, but much less so in Uganda and Tanzania. In Kenya, democratic constitutional values are negatively related to support for the ruling institutions, while in Tanzania, the same values strengthen support for the government. A positive evaluation of democratic procedures and government output explains much of the support for the ruling institutions, while a perceived high level of corruption and a low estimation of delivered democratic procedures lend support to the opposition. Kenya appears to have reached a more advanced democratic awareness than the other two countries. While some important democratic institutions have taken root in the three countries, there is still a long way to go before the region has attained stable democracy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2011. Vol. 18, no 5, 1168-1192 p.
Keyword [en]
democracy, institutions, trust, political opposition, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-179598DOI: 10.1080/13510347.2011.603479OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-179598DiVA: diva2:545341
Available from: 2012-08-20 Created: 2012-08-20 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13510347.2011.603479

Authority records BETA

Uddhammar, Emil

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Uddhammar, Emil
By organisation
Department of Government
In the same journal
Democratization
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 387 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf