uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Challenging bio-objectification: adding noise to transgenic silences
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute for Housing and Urban Research.
2011 (English)In: Theory, Technology and Society : Bio-Objects : Life in the 21st Century / [ed] Vermeulen, N., Tamminen, S., Webster, A. (eds.), Gower: Ashgate, 2011, 13-26 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

A transgenic animal can be viewed as a boundary walker – or crawler – transgressing cultural boundaries, and hybridizing categories such as nature and culture, animal and human, organism and innovation, science and technology. Transgenic mice (it is most often mice that are used, even though all kinds of mammals and invertebrates have been modified – sheep, rats, dogs, fish etcetera) create certain dilemmas because they are “trans” – both a product and a process – and crawl over institutional as well as species boundaries. A transgenic mouse is of course also in many ways like any other laboratory mouse; purpose- and inbred, standardised, preferably pathogen free, in short, an animal constructed through history to suite experimental purposes. Our contribution to the anthology dwells on and explores what the bio-object concept can do in terms of further understanding the life (and death) of a transgenic animal, which is in Haraway’s terms “at once completely ordinary and the stuff of science fiction”. The ambiguous character of transgenic animals, captured so well in Haraway’s quote rarely becomes articulated, neither in laboratories and ethics committees, nor in interviews with people who represent these arenas. Perhaps the most striking result of the project is that people, who work with and/or ethically review research with transgenic mice, seldom articulate that there are any specific dilemmas for this branch. Transgenic animals have thus not become an “issue”, in contrast to for example genetically modified crops, cloned animals or genetic tests. We will illuminate the production of transgenic silences, and show how the silences in turn can be challenged by the bio-objects – the TG  mice – themselves. The project builds on case studies, and the empirical data has been collected through ethnography, including observations and interviews, focusing on how researchers and members of animal ethics committees handle dilemmas with animal experiments in general and transgenic animals in particular.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Gower: Ashgate, 2011. 13-26 p.
Keyword [en]
transgenic, animal, silence, ethics, rhetoric, discourse analysis
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-183971ISBN: 978-1-4094-1178-9OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-183971DiVA: diva2:565075
Available from: 2012-11-06 Created: 2012-11-06 Last updated: 2013-01-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Institute for Housing and Urban Research
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 282 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link