uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Variation in Warfarin Dose Adjustment Practice Is Responsible for Differences in the Quality of Anticoagulation Control Between Centers and Countries An Analysis of Patients Receiving Warfarin in the Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) Trial
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Circulation, ISSN 0009-7322, E-ISSN 1524-4539, Vol. 126, no 19, 2309-2316 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background-The outcome of atrial fibrillation patients on warfarin partially depends on maintaining adequate time in therapeutic International Normalized Ratio range (TTR). Large differences in TTR have been reported between centers and countries. The association between warfarin dosing practice, TTR, and clinical outcomes was evaluated in Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulation Therapy (RE-LY) trial patients receiving warfarin. Methods and Results-RE-LY provided an algorithm for warfarin dosing, recommending no change for in-range, and 10% to 15% weekly dose changes for out-of-range International Normalized Ratio values. We determined whether dose adjustments were consistent with algorithm recommendations but could not verify whether providers used the algorithm. Using multilevel regression models to adjust for patient, center, and country characteristics, we assessed whether algorithm-consistent warfarin dosing could predict patient TTR and the composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolism, or major hemorrhage. We included 6022 nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients from 912 centers in 44 countries. We found a strong association between the proportion of algorithm-consistent warfarin doses and mean country TTR (R-2 = 0.65). The degree of algorithm-consistency accounted for 87% of the between-center and 55% of the between-country TTR variation. Each 10% increase in center algorithm-consistent dosing independently predicted a 6.12% increase in TTR (95% confidence interval, 5.65-6.59) and an 8% decrease in rate of the composite clinical outcome (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.00). Conclusions-Adherence, intentional or not, to a simple warfarin dosing algorithm predicts improved TTR and accounts for considerable TTR variation between centers and countries. Systems facilitating algorithm-based warfarin dosing could optimize anticoagulation quality and improve clinical outcomes in atrial fibrillation on a global scale. Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00262600. (Circulation. 2012; 126: 2309-2316.)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 126, no 19, 2309-2316 p.
Keyword [en]
atrial fibrillation, outcomes assessment, quality improvement, warfarin
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-187635DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.101808ISI: 000310744100012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-187635DiVA: diva2:575433
Available from: 2012-12-10 Created: 2012-12-10 Last updated: 2013-01-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wallentin, Lars
By organisation
UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center
In the same journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 132 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link