uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Can spirometric norms be set using pre- or post- bronchodilator test results in older people?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Respiratory Medicine and Allergology.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Respiratory research (Online), ISSN 1465-993X, Vol. 13, no 1, 102- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is defined by post-bronchodilator spirometry. Data on "normal values" come predominantly from pre-bronchodilator spirometry. The effects of this on diagnosis are unknown.


Lower limits of normal (LLN) were estimated from "normal" participants in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) programme. Values separately derived using pre- and post-bronchodilator spirometry were compared. Sensitivity and specificity of criteria derived from pre-bronchodilator spirometry and pre-bronchodilator spirometry adjusted by a constant were assessed in the remaining population. The "gold standard" was the LLN for the post-bronchodilator spirometry in the "normal population". For FEV1/FVC, sensitivity and specificity of criteria were assessed when a fixed value of < 70% was used rather than LLN.


Of 6,600 participants with full data, 1,354 were defined as "normal". Mean differences between pre- and post- bronchodilator measurements were small and the Bland-Altman plots showed no association between difference and mean value. Compared with using the gold standard, however, tests using pre-bronchodilator spirometry had a sensitivity and specificity of detecting a low FEV1 of 78.4% and 100%, a low FVC of 99.6% and 99.1% and a low FEV1/FVC ratio of 65% and 100%. Adjusting this by a constant improved the sensitivity without substantially altering the specificity for FEV1 (99%, 99.8%), FVC (97.4%, 99.9%) and FEV1/FVC (98.7%, 99.5%).


Using pre-bronchodilator spirometry to derive norms for lung function reduces sensitivity compared to a post-bronchodilator gold standard. Adjustment of these values by a constant can improve validity of the test.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 13, no 1, 102- p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-191204DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-13-102ISI: 000314828800001PubMedID: 23157675OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-191204DiVA: diva2:585038
Available from: 2013-01-09 Created: 2013-01-09 Last updated: 2013-03-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Janson, Christer
By organisation
Respiratory Medicine and Allergology
In the same journal
Respiratory research (Online)
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 162 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link