uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Perceived 3D metric (or Euclidean) shape is merely ambiguous, not systematically distorted
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Division of Visual Information and Interaction. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction.
2013 (English)In: Experimental Brain Research, ISSN 0014-4819, E-ISSN 1432-1106, Vol. 224, no 4, 551-555 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Many studies have reported that perceived shape is systematically distorted, but Lind et al. (Inf Vis 2:51-57, 2003) and Todd and Norman (Percept Psychophys 65:31-47, 2003) both found that distortions varied with tasks and observers. We now investigated the hypothesis that perception of 3D metric (or Euclidean) shape is ambiguous rather than systematically distorted by testing whether variations in context would systematically alter apparent distortions. The task was to adjust the aspect ratio of an ellipse on a computer screen to match the cross-section of a target elliptical cylinder object viewed in either frontoparallel elliptical cross-section (2D) or elliptical cross-section in depth (3D). Three different groups were tested using two tasks and two different ranges of aspect ratio: Group 1) 2D(Small) -> 3D(Large), Group 2) 2D(Large) -> 3D(Small), Group 3a) 2D(Small) -> 3D(Small), and Group 3b) 2D(Large) -> 3D(Large). Observers performed the 2D task accurately. This provided the context. The results showed the expected order of slopes when judged aspect ratios were regressed on actual aspect ratios: Group 1 (SL) < Group 3 (SS and LL) < Group 2 (LS). The ambiguity of perceived 3D aspect ratios allowed the range of aspect ratios experienced in the 2D task to affect the 3D judgments systematically. Nevertheless, when the 2D and 3D ranges of aspect ratios were the same (LL and SS) and the 2D were judged accurately, this did not yield accurate 3D judgments. The results supported the hypothesis that perceived 3D metric shape is merely ambiguous rather than systematically distorted.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 224, no 4, 551-555 p.
Keyword [en]
3D shape perception, Structure-from-motion, Stereo, Affine shape
National Category
Human Computer Interaction
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-197084DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3334-yISI: 000314766800004OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-197084DiVA: diva2:611593
Available from: 2013-03-18 Created: 2013-03-18 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Lind, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lind, Mats
By organisation
Division of Visual Information and InteractionComputerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction
In the same journal
Experimental Brain Research
Human Computer Interaction

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 387 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf