uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Anisotropic Isolation by Distance: The Main Orientations of Human Genetic Differentiation
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Biology, Department of Ecology and Genetics, Evolutionary Biology. Uppsala University, Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab.
2013 (English)In: Molecular biology and evolution, ISSN 0737-4038, E-ISSN 1537-1719, Vol. 30, no 3, 513-525 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Genetic differentiation among human populations is greatly influenced by geography due to the accumulation of local allele frequency differences. However, little is known about the possibly different increment of genetic differentiation along the different geographical axes (north-south, east-west, etc.). Here, we provide new methods to examine the asymmetrical patterns of genetic differentiation. We analyzed genome-wide polymorphism data from populations in Africa (n = 29), Asia (n = 26), America (n = 9), and Europe (n = 38), and we found that the major orientations of genetic differentiation are north-south in Europe and Africa, and east-west in Asia, but no preferential orientation was found in the Americas. Additionally, we showed that the localization of the individual geographic origins based on single nucleotide polymorphism data was not equally precise along all orientations. Confirming our findings, we obtained that, in each continent, the orientation along which the precision is maximal corresponds to the orientation of maximum differentiation. Our results have implications for interpreting human genetic variation in terms of isolation by distance and spatial range expansion processes. In Europe, for instance, the precise northnorthwest-southsoutheast axis of main European differentiation cannot be explained by a simple Neolithic demic diffusion model without admixture with the local populations because in that case the orientation of greatest differentiation should be perpendicular to the direction of expansion. In addition to humans, anisotropic analyses can guide the description of genetic differentiation for other organisms and provide information on expansions of invasive species or the processes of plant dispersal.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 30, no 3, 513-525 p.
Keyword [en]
population structure, genetic differentiation, HGDP-CEPH, POPRES, SNP, anisotropy
National Category
Natural Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-197056DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mss259ISI: 000314891800003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-197056DiVA: diva2:611736
Available from: 2013-03-18 Created: 2013-03-18 Last updated: 2013-03-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjödin, PerJakobsson, Mattias
By organisation
Evolutionary BiologyScience for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab
In the same journal
Molecular biology and evolution
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 217 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link