uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in 65-Year-old Men Remains Cost-effective with Contemporary Epidemiology and Management
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6561-9734
Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, ISSN 1078-5884, E-ISSN 1532-2165, Vol. 47, no 4, 357-365 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives

The epidemiology and management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) has changed significantly, with lower prevalence, increased longevity of patients, increased use of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and improved outcome. The clinical and health economic effectiveness of one-time screening of 65-year-old men was assessed within this context.

Methods

One-time ultrasound screening of 65-year-old men (invited) versus no screening (control) was analysed in a Markov model. Data on the natural course of AAA (risk of repair and rupture) was based on randomised controlled trials. Screening detected AAA prevalence (1.7%), surgical management (50% EVAR), repair outcome, costs, and long-term survival were based on contemporary population-based data. Incremental cost-efficiency ratios (ICER), absolute and relative risk reduction for death from AAA (ARR, RRR), numbers needed to screen (NNS), and life-years gained were calculated. Annual discounting was 3.5%.

Results

In base case at 13-years follow-up the ICER was €14,706 per incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY); ARR was 15.1 per 10,000 invited, NNS was 530, and QALYs gained were 56.5 per 10,000 invited. RRR was 42% (from 0.36% in control to 0.21% in invited). In a lifetime analysis the ICER of screening decreased to €7,570/QALY. The parameters with highest impact on the cost-efficiency of screening in the sensitivity analysis were the prevalence of AAA (threshold value <0.5%) and degree of incidental detection in the control cohort.

Conclusions

In the face of recent changes in the management and epidemiology of AAA, screening men for AAA remains cost-effective and delivers significant clinical impact.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 47, no 4, 357-365 p.
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-198491DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.12.023ISI: 000333855900005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-198491DiVA: diva2:616271
Funder
Swedish Research Council, K2010-65X-20406-04-3
Available from: 2013-04-16 Created: 2013-04-16 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
2013 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Randomised controlled trials have demonstrated that mortality from Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) can be cost-effectively reduced by ultrasound-screening of men. Evidence for screening women is insufficient. Reports of falling AAA incidence are emerging.

In an effort to study screening for AAA in a contemporary setting, two cross-sectional multi-centre population-based studies of one-time screening of 65-year-old men, and 70-year-old women in Middle Sweden were undertaken. Cost-efficiency of one-time screening of 65-year-old men was evaluated in a decision-analysis model. Five-year outcomes in men invited to screening at age 65 and age 70, were studied in a longitudinal cohort study.

A lower than expected (1.7%) prevalence of AAA in 65-year-old men was found, as well as a very low (0.4%) prevalence in 70-year-old women. Smoking was the dominating risk factor associated with AAA, but the association was stronger in women. The main cause of reduced contemporary prevalence was falling smoking rates in the population since 30 years.

One-time screening of 65-year-old men was found to be cost-effective and deliver significant clinical impact. The cost per quality adjusted life-year gained, at 13-years follow-up, was €14706, which was below the recommended UK NICE threshold of €25000. 15 lives were saved by inviting 10000 to screening. Prevalence of AAA and the rate of incidental detection of AAAs in the population were important factors affecting cost-efficiency.

New AAAs developed after 5 years in men screened normal at age 65, predominantly in men with sub-aneurysmal aortas (25-29mm) at 65, and smokers. The 5-year rate of AAA repair was high among men with screening detected AAAs, as was non-AAA related mortality. Ruptures were only documented among non-attenders.

Conclusions: A lower than expected prevalence of AAA among 65-year-old men, an unchanged repair rate, and improved longevity of the elderly population was found. Although one-time screening for AAA was still cost-effective within a contemporary context, several issues need to be addressed; the threshold diameter for follow-up, the current rate of opportunistic detection of AAA in the population, re-screening of the entire population at a higher age, and targeted screening of smokers. Screening 70-year-old women who do not smoke is likely to be futile, thus ruling out population screening of women for AAA.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2013. 82 p.
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Medicine, ISSN 1651-6206 ; 903
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-198677 (URN)978-91-554-8668-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2013-06-07, Föreläsningssalen, Falu Lasarett, Entré 6:C 01, Söderbaums väg 8, Falun, 13:15 (English)
Available from: 2013-05-17 Created: 2013-04-22 Last updated: 2013-08-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Svensjö, SverkerMani, KevinBjörck, MartinWanhainen, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svensjö, SverkerMani, KevinBjörck, MartinWanhainen, Anders
By organisation
Vascular Surgery
In the same journal
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1278 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf