uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Simple translational equations to compare illness severity scores in intensive care trials
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Journal of critical care, ISSN 0883-9441, E-ISSN 1557-8615, Vol. 28, no 5, 885.e1- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]


Comparison of illness severity for intensive care unit populations assessed according to different scoring systems should increase our ability to compare and meta-analyze past and future trials but is currently not possible. Accordingly, we aimed to establish a methodology to translate illness severity scores obtained from one system into another.


Using the Australian and New-Zealand intensive care adult patient database, we obtained simultaneous admission Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and APACHE III scores and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II in 634428 patients admitted to 153 units between 2001 and 2010. We applied linear regression analyses to create models enabling translation of one score into another. Sensitivity analyses were performed after removal of diagnostic categories excluded from the original APACHE database, after matching for similar risk of death, after splitting data according to country of origin (Australia or New Zealand) and after splitting admissions occurring before or after 2006.


The translational models were APACHE III = 3.08 × APACHE II + 5.75; APACHE III = 1.47 × SAPS II + 8.6; and APACHE II = 0.36 × SAPS II + 4.4. The area under the receiver operating curve for mortality prediction was 0.853 (95% confidence interval, 0.851-0.855) for the "APACHE II derived APACHE III" score and 0.854 (0.852-0.855) for the "SAPS II derived APACHE III" vs 0.854 (0.852-0.855) for the original APACHE III score. Similarly, it was 0.841 (0.839-0.843) for the "SAPS II derived APACHE II score" vs 0.842 (0.840-0.843) for the original APACHE II score. Correlation coefficients as well as intercepts remained very similar in all subgroups analyses.


Simple and robust translational formulas can be developed to allow clinicians to compare illness severity between studies involving critically ill patients. Further studies in other countries and health care systems are needed to confirm the generalizability of these results.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 28, no 5, 885.e1- p.
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-204362DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.02.003ISI: 000324374700064PubMedID: 23566728OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-204362DiVA: diva2:638668
Available from: 2013-08-01 Created: 2013-08-01 Last updated: 2013-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lipcsey, Miklós
By organisation
Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care
In the same journal
Journal of critical care
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 248 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link