uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Marginal Consumers, Marginalised Economics: Whose Tastes and Habits Should the WTO Panels and Appellate Body Consider when Assessing 'Likeness'?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2014 (English)In: Journal of World Trade, ISSN 1011-6702, E-ISSN 2210-2795, Vol. 48, no 2, 323-349 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In Philippines—Distilled Spirits, the Appellate Body of the WTO reaffirmed that the determination of ‘likeness’ in the GATT should be about the competitive relationship between products. A coherent methodology for the determination of ‘likeness’ has finally begun to emerge, with the same methodology having been adopted in the GATS (Panel Report, China—Electronic Payments) and the TBT Agreement (Appellate Body Report, US—Clove Cigarettes). Yet, mainstream as the adoption of competition law methodology for the finding of ‘likeness’ may have become as of recent, its implementation by the adjudicating bodies of the WTO is still inadequate, as demonstrated by the disputes examined in this article. One recurrent problem is the choice of whose consumers’ tastes and habits to take into account in the determination of ‘likeness’. As shown in the article, competition law has had to deal with the same problem and has developed ways to address common fallacies arising out of relying on evidence regarding the choices of groups of consumers without the groups having been shown to be economically significant. The analysis suggests that the shortcomings of the application of competition law methodology at WTO dispute settlement can be easily addressed in the short-term by raising the awareness of the WTO Members, panels, and the Appellate Body to them, and by turning to competition law for readily available solutions, while increasing the institutional capacity of the adjudicating bodies of the WTO in the long-term. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2014. Vol. 48, no 2, 323-349 p.
Keyword [en]
WTO, dispute settlement, competition law, antitrust law, law and economics, economic evidence, Philippines-Distilled Spirits, US-Clove Cigarettes, marginal consumers, captive consumers
National Category
Law
Research subject
Public International Law; European (Integration) Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-205610ISI: 000349060200005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-205610DiVA: diva2:642211
Available from: 2013-08-21 Created: 2013-08-21 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Iacovides, Marios

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Iacovides, Marios
By organisation
Department of Law
In the same journal
Journal of World Trade
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 464 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf