uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Country guidance in asylum cases:: approaches in the UK and Sweden Refugee Law Initiative Working Paper Series No. 9
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law. Refugee Law Initiative, Human Rights Consortium, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
2013 (English)Other (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The fundamental issue in asylum adjudication has been described as ensuring that those at risk of persecution on their return are afforded the protection to which they are entitled under international and national law, while preventing those who are not at risk from exploiting the asylum process as an alternative route of entry. Information on the situation in a particular country or region is essential both for judging the objective risk of harm upon return for the asylum seeker and the assessment of the claimant’s narrative. Judges and decision makers therefore need to have access to detailed, reliable and up-to-date information. It is equally important that they do not reach dramatically different conclusions on the same material as this would jeopardise the predictability of decision making, rendering it arbitrary and unfair. The manner in which guidance is provided on how questions of law and fact are to be interpreted in order to achieve consistency and predictability varies between countries, depending on their legal systems and traditions. In the United Kingdom, a system of Country Guidance cases has developed which provides guidance on the situation in a particular country or region. This is to a large extent binding on similar cases. In Sweden as well as in many other European countries, there is no similar system. In this working paper, it is discussed how the matter of country guidance is approached in Sweden and the United Kingdom respectively. It is suggested that for a system of country guidance cases to be introduced not only does a number of practical requirements need to be fulfilled; it is equally necessary that providing guidance on matters of fact rather than on purely legal matters is a task accepted and embraced as such by the courts and one that is considered compatible with the legal tradition of the country in question.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: University of London , 2013. , 30 p.
, Refugee Law Initiative Working Papers, 9
Keyword [en]
country guidance, asylum, legal culture, legal certainty, Sweden, United Kingdom, refugee law
National Category
Research subject
Public International Law
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-206541OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-206541DiVA: diva2:644680
Overlapping protection or conflicting rules? A study of the concept of subsidiary protection in the context of Swedish, EU and international law
Swedish Research Council, 2009-1688
Available from: 2013-09-01 Created: 2013-09-01 Last updated: 2015-08-31

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stern, Rebecca
By organisation
Department of Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 234 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link