uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Structured Diagnostic and Treatment Approach Versus the Usual Primary Care Approach in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Cluster-randomized Multicenter Study
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, ISSN 0192-0790, E-ISSN 1539-2031, Vol. 47, no 7, E65-E73 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Goals: To compare the clinical outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients treated with an implemented new structured pathway (NSP) or according to existing local clinical practices [old clinical pathway (OCP)]. Background: GERD is a major challenge at the primary care level. Study: Primary care centers (n=24) were cluster randomized to handle patients suffering from symptoms suggestive of GERD according to the NSP (n=97) or the OCP (n=134). In the NSP, the GerdQ questionnaire score was used both for diagnosis and management including treatment. We used validated questionnaires to evaluate disease symptoms, quality of life, and costs at inclusion and at follow-up 2 to 6 months later. Results: On the basis of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire, 56% of the patients treated with the NSP reported total symptom relief at the follow-up compared with 33% in the OCP group (P=0.0013). The reflux symptoms after treatment affected daily activities to a lesser extent in the patients in the NSP group compared with the OCP group (10% vs. 13%, respectively, P=0.01). The utility score of the EuroQoL-5D questionnaire improved more in the NSP group than in the OCP group (0.05 vs. 0.02, respectively, P<0.001). The patients in the NSP group had an approximately 50% lower average total cost for GERD-related health care resources compared with the OCP group [301 Swedish Kronor (SEK) vs. 588 SEK, respectively, NS]. Conclusions: The management of GERD patients in primary care centers using a structured clinical pathway and the results of the GerdQ improves the clinical outcome compared with prevailing local routines (NCT00842387).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 47, no 7, E65-E73 p.
Keyword [en]
gastroesophageal reflux disease, primary care, randomized trial, health-related quality of life, health economics
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-207644DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31827d7782ISI: 000323228000001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-207644DiVA: diva2:649036
Available from: 2013-09-17 Created: 2013-09-17 Last updated: 2013-09-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hellström, Per M.
By organisation
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 145 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link