uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of Methods for Handling Missing Covariate Data
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences.
2013 (English)In: AAPS Journal, ISSN 1550-7416, E-ISSN 1550-7416, Vol. 15, no 4, p. 1232-1241Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Missing covariate data is a common problem in nonlinear mixed effects modelling of clinical data. The aim of this study was to implement and compare methods for handling missing covariate data in nonlinear mixed effects modelling under different missing data mechanisms. Simulations generated data for 200 individuals with a 50% difference in clearance between males and females. Three different types of missing data mechanisms were simulated and information about sex was missing for 50% of the individuals. Six methods for handling the missing covariate were compared in a stochastic simulations and estimations study where 200 data sets were simulated. The methods were compared according to bias and precision of parameter estimates. Multiple imputation based on weight and response, full maximum likelihood modelling using information on weight and full maximum likelihood modelling where the proportion of males among the individuals lacking information about sex was estimated (EST) gave precise and unbiased estimates in the presence of missing data when data were missing completely at random or missing at random. When data were missing not at random, the only method resulting in low bias and high parameter precision was EST.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 15, no 4, p. 1232-1241
Keywords [en]
categorical data, covariates, missing data, NONMEM
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-210183DOI: 10.1208/s12248-013-9526-yISI: 000325126300034OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-210183DiVA, id: diva2:661555
Available from: 2013-11-04 Created: 2013-11-04 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Methodology for Handling Missing Data in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Modelling
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Methodology for Handling Missing Data in Nonlinear Mixed Effects Modelling
2014 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

To obtain a better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic characteristics of an investigated treatment, clinical data is often analysed with nonlinear mixed effects modelling. The developed models can be used to design future clinical trials or to guide individualised drug treatment. Missing data is a frequently encountered problem in analyses of clinical data, and to not venture the predictability of the developed model, it is of great importance that the method chosen to handle the missing data is adequate for its purpose. The overall aim of this thesis was to develop methods for handling missing data in the context of nonlinear mixed effects models and to compare strategies for handling missing data in order to provide guidance for efficient handling and consequences of inappropriate handling of missing data.

In accordance with missing data theory, all missing data can be divided into three categories; missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR) and missing not at random (MNAR). When data are MCAR, the underlying missing data mechanism does not depend on any observed or unobserved data; when data are MAR, the underlying missing data mechanism depends on observed data but not on unobserved data; when data are MNAR, the underlying missing data mechanism depends on the unobserved data itself.

Strategies and methods for handling missing observation data and missing covariate data were evaluated. These evaluations showed that the most frequently used estimation algorithm in nonlinear mixed effects modelling (first-order conditional estimation), resulted in biased parameter estimates independent on missing data mechanism. However, expectation maximization (EM) algorithms (e.g. importance sampling) resulted in unbiased and precise parameter estimates as long as data were MCAR or MAR. When the observation data are MNAR, a proper method for handling the missing data has to be applied to obtain unbiased and precise parameter estimates, independent on estimation algorithm.

The evaluation of different methods for handling missing covariate data showed that a correctly implemented multiple imputations method and full maximum likelihood modelling methods resulted in unbiased and precise parameter estimates when covariate data were MCAR or MAR. When the covariate data were MNAR, the only method resulting in unbiased and precise parameter estimates was a full maximum likelihood modelling method where an extra parameter was estimated, correcting for the unknown missing data mechanism's dependence on the missing data.

This thesis presents new insight to the dynamics of missing data in nonlinear mixed effects modelling. Strategies for handling different types of missing data have been developed and compared in order to provide guidance for efficient handling and consequences of inappropriate handling of missing data.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2014. p. 75
Series
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy, ISSN 1651-6192 ; 189
Keywords
Pharmacometrics, population models, censored observations, missing covariates, missing dependent variable, missing data mechanism, missing completely at random (MCAR), missing at random (MAR), missing not at random (MNAR), estimation algorithms
National Category
Pharmaceutical Sciences
Research subject
Pharmaceutical Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-224098 (URN)978-91-554-8970-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2014-08-29, B41, BMC, Husargatan 3, Uppsala, 09:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2014-05-27 Created: 2014-05-03 Last updated: 2018-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Johansson, Åsa M.Karlsson, Mats O.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Åsa M.Karlsson, Mats O.
By organisation
Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences
In the same journal
AAPS Journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 510 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf