uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Repositories Recreated: The Finch report versus DiVA in Sweden
Uppsala University, University Library.
Uppsala University, University Library.
2013 (English)In: Information Services and Use, ISSN 0167-5265, E-ISSN 1875-8789, Vol. 33, no 2, 183-189 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recently the technological and organizational infrastructures of institutional repositories have been questioned. For example the British so-called Finch report  from last summer argued that further development, as well as higher standards of accessibility of repositories, are needed in order to make them better integrated and interoperable to ultimately bring greater use by both authors and readers. Not only the technical frameworks and presumably low usage levels are criticized but also the lack of “clear policies on such matters as the content they will accept, the uses to which it may be put, and the role that they will play in preservation”. The report concludes that: “In practice patterns of deposit are patchy”.

As in the UK, today, all universities and university colleges in Sweden, except a couple of very small and specialized ones, do have an institutional repository. A majority (around 80%) are working together on a co-operative basis within the DiVA Publishing System with the Electronic Publishing Centre at Uppsala University Library acting as the technical and organizational hub. Because the system is jointly funded, and the members contribute according to their size, it has been possible even for smaller institutions with limited resources to run a repository with exactly the same functionalities as the biggest universities.

In this article we want to demonstrate the ever-increasing importance of institutional repositories in Sweden. Starting more than a decade ago the DiVA Consortium has, for some time, been addressing the problems now raised by the Finch report in a number of areas.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 33, no 2, 183-189 p.
Keyword [en]
DiVA, Sweden, Electronic publishing, Institutional repositories, Research information
National Category
Information Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-210362DOI: 10.3233/ISU-130696OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-210362DiVA: diva2:662087
Conference
ELPUB 2013, 17th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, Mining the Digital Information Networks June 13-14, 2013, Blekinge Institute of Technology, Karlskrona, Sweden
Available from: 2013-11-06 Created: 2013-11-06 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(142 kB)68 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 142 kBChecksum SHA-512
9041d97d8f1f1a485fd79c36077be41f11cc69c61eae8d84ba5bfc8a16128dc785dacbc0b19a39a81a9f10c0e6cadfe5dcf91d67cdb52942ead948435bf0cd48
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Andersson, StefanSvensson, Aina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, StefanSvensson, Aina
By organisation
University Library
In the same journal
Information Services and Use
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 68 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 554 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf