uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Automous Technology - Sources of Confusion: A Model for Explanation and Prediction of Conceptual Shifts
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics and Media, Human-Computer Interaction. Swedish Defence College, Department of Military Technology. (Cognitive Ergonomics & Humans in Complex Systems)
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Division of Visual Information and Interaction. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology, Computerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction. (Cognitive Ergonomics & Humans in Complex Systems)
2014 (English)In: Ergonomics, ISSN 0014-0139, E-ISSN 1366-5847, Vol. 57, no 3, 455-470 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Today, autonomous is often used for technology with a more intelligent self-management capability than common automation. This concept usage is maladaptive, ignoring both the distinction between autonomy and heteronomy according to Kant’s categorical imperative and that the meaning of autonomy implies qualities technology cannot have. Being autonomous is about having the right to be wrong, a right justified by accountability and insightful understanding of real-life values, and it is about being externally uncontrollable. The contemporary use of autonomy as well as similar concepts is discussed and a model is presented showing how six sources of confusion interact in a vicious circle that impede human authority and autonomy. Our goal is to sort out these confusions and contribute to a development in which the different roles of machines and people, and human responsibilities, are explicated rather than blurred, which should facilitate the forming of truly beneficial and complementary systems.

Abstract [en]

Practitioner Summary: The maladaptive use of autonomous and similar human concepts for technological systems is discussed in relation to the current situation for human – systems interaction. A model is presented combining six sources of confusion into a vicious circle that predict two problems that lead to reduced human authority.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2014. Vol. 57, no 3, 455-470 p.
Keyword [en]
Autonomous, Automation, Human-Machine Interaction, Ethics, Risk Analysis
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Research subject
Human-Computer Interaction
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-212648DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.858777ISI: 000333877900013OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-212648DiVA: diva2:678742
Available from: 2013-12-05 Created: 2013-12-12 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Stensson, PatrikJansson, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stensson, PatrikJansson, Anders
By organisation
Human-Computer InteractionDivision of Visual Information and InteractionComputerized Image Analysis and Human-Computer Interaction
In the same journal
Ergonomics
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 493 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf