uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hur ”vi” konstruerar ”vi”: En deduktiv diskurspsykologisk studie av vi-dem konstruktioner utifrån social identitetsteori
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology, The Social Sciences of Religion, Psychology of Religions.
2014 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The ambition of this paper is to study the construction of the categorization between “us” and “them” in a religious minority, represented by Jehovah’s Witnesses and a nationalist political party, represented by the Swedish Democrats. This will be done by a discursive psychology analysis of their official publications on each group’s website. By a deductive study using Henri Tajfel’s Social Identity Theory trying to disclose the psychological processes; social categorization, social identity, social comparison and psychological distinctiveness. The study will also include one potential danger of the “us” and “them” categorization – terrorism, through Fathali M. Moghaddam’s Staircase to Terrorism. This will be done partly through comparing the two theories to see where they overlap and how they differ. Partly through looking at Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Swedish Democrats publication in light of the Staircase to Terrorism. The aim is not to accuse either of these groups of terrorism, but mainly to show what preconditions each groups’ ideologies contain as formulated on their websites.   The achieved results of this study shows that the psychological processes to create and maintain the dichotomy between “us” and “them” in a religious minority and a nationalistic political party overlap in several ways. For instance both claim that everybody is welcome to join the ingroup, if they are prepared to assimilate. This however might be harder for some groups than others in the case of the Swedish Democrats.   The differences is mostly found in the psychological distinctiveness, where Jehovah’s witnesses focus on social creativity, that is to choose social comparison group and changing dimensions of comparing. While the Swedish Democrats do obtain these strategies as well as their aim to improve the ingroups’ status focuses on social competition through political action.    As for terrorism both groups shows some tendencies that overlap with the preconditions for potential terrorist groups or “steps” of the Staircase to Terrorism. For instant they both have a clear dichotomy between “us” and “them”, and they believe their “we” – ingroup to be threatened and considers the society to be in need of great change. This does not mean however that either of these groups is on the edge to terrorism. The main reason found to why they don’t take terrorist action is, in the case of Jehovah’s Witnesses that they believe it to be Gods mission to create societal change. In the case of the Swedish Democrats they do not consider violence to be the only option. But it shows the danger of categorization between “us” and “them”.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 51 p.
Keyword [en]
Religious minority, nationalism, Social Identity Theory, Intergroup relations, Staircase to Terrorism
National Category
Religious Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-215707OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-215707DiVA: diva2:688746
Subject / course
Psychology of religion
Educational program
Teacher Education Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-01-17 Created: 2014-01-15 Last updated: 2014-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Hur ”vi” konstruerar ”vi” – En deduktiv diskurspsykologisk studie av vi-dem konstruktioner utifrån social identitetsteori(1003 kB)482 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1003 kBChecksum SHA-512
0bf4d85522401c6e71250c4790d34395bad0a1e5e46014f70a9009780e5fb981cba068fe472695d03d6dd6887fba5c31b159fe0520612622b35571dd8c96a072
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Psychology of Religions
Religious Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 482 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1164 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf