uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diskussioner inommatematikämnet: Kreativa och Imitativa diskussioneroch när de används i undervisningen
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education.
2013 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this essay is to examine when teachers choose to discuss mathematics withstudents rather then just talk about mathematics. A definition where used to distinguish betweenan interaction that is not a discussion and an interaction that is a discussion. This definition hasbeen created by drawing ideas from other works into making a quite simple definition whichtherefore is easy to observe. The discussions are also separated into two different kinds ofdiscussions. The first and most common category of discussion are one where only imitativereasoning is used. The other type of discussion contains at least one sign of creative reasoning.The terminology imitative and creative reasoning comes from Lithners work A framework foranalysing creative and imitative mathematical reasoning. The data collected comes from observationsfrom three different schools. Five teachers where observed and a total of thirteen classes. Toregister the data and make the observations objective a observations chart where developedcontaining different categories of interaction. From the collected data diagrams where created inorder to show statistics of how often and when discussions containing imitative reasoning orcreative reasoning where used. Of all kinds of observed interaction teachers are using duringclasses discussions make up to about fifty percent. The rest is interaction which could not becategorized as discussions. The overall picture of the data show that creative discussions arerarely used and that teachers talk and discuss subjects that relates to the students personal studysituation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. , 38 p.
Series
Examensarbete vid Institutionen för pedagogik, didaktik och utbildningsstudier, 2013ht00650
Keyword [sv]
Didaktik, observationer, kreativa & imitativa resonemang, matematik
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-217753OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-217753DiVA: diva2:693566
Subject / course
Educational Sciences
Educational program
Teacher Education Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-02-05 Created: 2014-02-04 Last updated: 2014-02-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

2013ht00650_Hagström(353 kB)112 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 353 kBChecksum SHA-512
35b891cd9ebc032b06f719bb940848f8540bfafbc7468c69d4b2b81f42ca3ce7b5a774b5b07a773e0ff9abe8996b91f1433653b9e3e2e4d63c2226e207a19cd1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Education
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 112 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 880 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf