uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Varför väljs nativeapplikationer istället för hybridapplikationer?: Prestandaskillnader hos hybridapplikationer
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Mathematics and Computer Science, Department of Information Technology.
2014 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The development of applications for mobile devices has exploded in recent times. This has also led to the introduction of several new mobile operating systems. To streamline application development for multiple platforms, techniques have been developed to be able to reuse the same application regardless of the operating system. If the same application can be used on multiple platforms it will save both a lot of time and money. Today there are three types of techniques to develop an application; web, hybrid and native application, where the latter is specific to the operating system it has been developed to. The previous two uses techniques that make large parts of the application re-usable on multiple platforms. Despite several advantages of the alternative techniques the majority of businesses still invests in native applications, but what is it that influences when it comes the the choice of technology?

Factors that justify a native application instead of a hybrid application has been identified and used as a basis for developing a hybrid application. Functionality and performance of the application is tested and compared on the platforms Android, iOS, Firefox OS and Tizen OS. The difference in performance between the platforms is largely in the device's hardware and available features differ very little. If you can get to grips with the problems identified in this report,  there is still a possibility that hybrid applications may be the technology choice that may be given priority in the future.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014.
Series
UPTEC IT, ISSN 1401-5749 ; 14 001
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-220116OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-220116DiVA: diva2:704125
Educational program
Master of Science Programme in Information Technology Engineering
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2014-03-25 Created: 2014-03-11 Last updated: 2014-03-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1309 kB)410 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1309 kBChecksum SHA-512
842b33fbb80e4e3acded04367e9654f1c79f7ed8a7a72f148d722bc11acae5d805613b2c0c19abf9387815849672abe0c160f415543b6b1d33e1a1cac20d1eab
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Information Technology
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 410 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 652 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf