uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Rättskraft och korrektiv: En förvaltningsrättslig studie
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2014 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)Alternative title
Res Judicata and Correctives : A Study in Administrative Law (English)
Abstract [en]

In Swedish administrative law, there are numerous opportunities for authorities and others who fulfill public tasks to correct decisions. As an important limitation of this power, there are general principles on the immovability of administrative decisions. As a general rule, a favorable decision may not be corrected. Some would say that this position is based on the principle of protection of legitimate expectations, a principle which is recognized in many legal systems. Individuals should be able to rely on the fact that decisions rendered by authorities will not suddenly be withdrawn.

This thesis examines rules and principles on the immovability of administrative decisions (res judicata) and the conditions under which such decisions can be corrected by the authorities. The issue of res judicata in general administrative law has not been investigated deeply in jurisprudence over the past sixty years. However, Swedish administrative law has been influenced by the administrative codifications in the 1970s, the expanding public sector and legislation, the introduction of the mandatory two-party procedure and by Sweden’s EU-membership in the 1990s. An overarching purpose of the thesis is therefore to investigate the extent to which the concept of res judicata has been affected by these factors or events. Further, the thesis takes up the issue of concept formation, both in terms of res judicata and in terms of the correction rules, which have a variety of designations such as: amendment; review; modification; and withdrawal.

It can be concluded that it is, and has been, difficult to agree on the content of the res judicata concept. This is also manifested in the absence of a general res judicata rule in the Administrative Procedure Act (1986:223). Based on the investigation undertaken and the results that emerged, a possible categorization of the res judicata concept is presented. The categorization made comprises three different models. Finally, an integration of the models is recommended.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen , 2014. , 375 p.
Keyword [sv]
Rättskraft, korrektiv, förvaltningsrätt, förvaltningsprocessrätt, gynnande beslut, trygghet, omprövning, rättelse, tvåpartsprocess, europeisering
National Category
Research subject
Administrative Law
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-221626ISBN: 978-91-506-2393-2OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-221626DiVA: diva2:709765
Public defence
2014-05-23, Sal IV, Universitetshuset, Uppsala, 10:15 (Swedish)

Distributör: Jure www.jure.se

Available from: 2014-04-29 Created: 2014-04-03 Last updated: 2014-08-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wall, Gustaf
By organisation
Department of Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 1555 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link