uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Making researchers moral: Why trustworthiness requires more than ethics guidelines and review
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7486-4678
Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics.
2014 (English)In: Research Ethics, ISSN 1747-0161, E-ISSN 2047-6094, Vol. 10, no 1, 29-46 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research ethics, once a platform for declaring intent, discussing moral issues and providing advice and guidance to researchers, has developed over time into an extra-legal regulatory system, complete with steering documents (ethics guidelines), overseeing bodies (research ethics committees) and formal procedures (informed consent). The process of institutionalizing distrust is usually motivated by reference to past atrocities committed in the name of research and the need to secure the trustworthiness of the research system. This article examines some limitations of this approach. First, past atrocities cannot provide the necessary justification unless institutionalized distrust is a necessary or efficient means to prevent future ones – and there are several reasons to doubt this. Second, the efficacy of ethics review in safeguarding morally acceptable research depends on the moral competence and integrity of individual researchers – the very qualities that institutionalized distrust calls into question. Third, ethics guidelines cannot, as is sometimes assumed, educate or guide researchers in moral behaviour unless they already possess considerable capacity for moral judgment. Fourth, institutionalized distrust is a potential threat to the moral competence and integrity of researchers by encouraging a blinkered view of ethical issues, inducing moral heteronomy through incentives, and alienating them to research ethics. We conclude that the moral problem posed by inappropriate short-term behaviour on behalf of researchers is dwarfed by the potential long-term consequences if their moral competence is allowed to deteriorate. Measures must therefore be taken to ensure that researchers are equipped to take their individual responsibility and are not obstructed from so doing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 10, no 1, 29-46 p.
Keyword [en]
institutionalized distrust, moral responsibility, moral competence, moral integrity, research ethics, scientific misconduct
National Category
Medical Ethics
Research subject
Bioethics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-222226DOI: 10.1177/1747016113504778OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-222226DiVA: diva2:711006
Available from: 2014-04-09 Created: 2014-04-09 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Johnsson et al 2014 - Making researchers moral(332 kB)435 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 332 kBChecksum SHA-512
daddf94cc0ea57f7d61fc6d127f6d90f09373b52848db67ef2c849fdf4c26dd8d763e3e4c2c638f9e3e5b798ae60dc338922581c959205e549528acb99f7dff2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Johnsson, LinusEriksson, StefanHansson, Mats G.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johnsson, LinusEriksson, StefanHansson, Mats G.
By organisation
Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics
In the same journal
Research Ethics
Medical Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 435 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 809 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf