uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality and relevance?: On the use of bibliometric studies in the evaluation and planning of didactical research
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Department of Education. (SMED)
2014 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this presentation is to analyse and discuss the use of bibliometric analyses in evaluation and planning of didactical research.

The presentation is based on a case study of “the norweigian model” and the results are discussed in relation to one of the ambitions within the didactical research community; to make knowledge contributions within the scientific field as well as to the professionals (C.f. Hudson & Meyer 2011).

The study of the use of bibliometric studies in the evaluation and planning of didactical research identify three main challenges:

(1)     In the case study, the ratio between the number of scientific publications (level 1 and level 2) and the total amount of publication is 31% (Nordgren 2011). The discussion of the use of bibliometric analyses for decisions about the allocation of research funds is focused on scientific publications, which may lead to a decrease of publications written for other audiences.

(2)     A benchmark on 25% publications on level 2 (as decided at Uppsala University) may actually lead to a decrease of the total number of scientific publications.

(3)     The bibliometic analyses says something about the result of the reseachers’ work, but nothing about the research process or its preconditions.

The presentation highlights the need of further discussions about different models for research evaluation, planning and publication.

References

Nordgren, Joseph (Ed.)(2012). Quality and renewal 2011. An overall evaluation of research at Uppsala University 2010/2011. Uppsala: Uppsala University.

Hudson, Brian & Meyer, Meinert A. (Eds.)(2011). Beyond fragmentation: didactics, learning and teaching in Europe. Opladen : Budrich, Barbara, 2011

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014.
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Curriculum Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-224396OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-224396DiVA: diva2:716532
Conference
NERA (Nordic Educational Research Association)
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2014-05-10 Created: 2014-05-10 Last updated: 2014-05-10

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Almqvist, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Almqvist, Jonas
By organisation
Department of Education
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 876 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf