uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Hausman-MaCurdy controversy : why do results differ between studies?
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
1997 (English)Report (Other scientific)
Abstract [en]

The two perhaps most influential empirical labor supply studies carried out in the U.S. in recent years, Hausman (1981) and MaCurdy, Green & Paarsch (1990), report sharply contradicting labor supply estimates. In this paper we seek to uncover the driving

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Department of Economics , 1997.
Series
Working paper / Department of Economics, Uppsala University, 1997:30
Keyword [en]
Ekonomisk Teori Arbete Arbetslön; Labour supply; Slutsky condition; Maximum likelihood estimation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-45097OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-45097DiVA: diva2:73004
Available from: 2008-10-17 Created: 2008-10-17

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://www.nek.uu.se/research/pdf/1997wp30.pdf
By organisation
Department of Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 355 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf