uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dentist and practice characteristics associated with restorative treatment of enamel caries in permanent teeth: Multiple-regression modeling of observational clinical data from The National Dental PBRN
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: American Journal of Dentistry, ISSN 0894-8275, Vol. 27, no 2, 91-99 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Current evidence in dentistry recommends non-surgical treatment to manage enamel caries lesions. However, surveyed practitioners report they would restore enamel lesions that are confined to the enamel. Actual clinical data were used to evaluate patient, dentist, and practice characteristics associated with restoration of enamel caries, while accounting for other factors. Methods: Data from a National Dental Practice-Based Research Network observational study of consecutive restorations placed in previously unrestored permanent tooth surfaces and practice/demographic data from 229 participating network dentists were combined. ANOVA and logistic regression, using generalized estimating equations (GEE) and variable selection within blocks, were used to test the hypothesis that patient, dentist, and practice characteristics were associated with variations in enamel restorations of occlusal and proximal caries compared to dentin lesions, accounting for dentist and patient clustering. Results: Network dentists from five regions placed 6,891 restorations involving occlusal and/or proximal caries lesions. Enamel restorations accounted for 16% of enrolled occlusal caries lesions and 6% of enrolled proximal caries lesions. Enamel occlusal restorations varied significantly (P< 0.05) by patient age and race/ethnicity, dentists' use of caries risk assessment, network region, and practice type. Enamel proximal restorations varied significantly (P< 0.05) by dentist race/ethnicity, network region, and practice type.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 27, no 2, 91-99 p.
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-227885ISI: 000336192500006OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-227885DiVA: diva2:731774
Available from: 2014-07-02 Created: 2014-07-01 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center
In the same journal
American Journal of Dentistry
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 365 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf