uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Internationally comparable diagnosis-specific survival probabilities for calculation of the ICD-10-based Injury Severity Score
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, ISSN 2163-0755, Vol. 76, no 2, 358-365 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) -based Injury Severity Score (ICISS) performs well but requires diagnosis-specific survival probabilities (DSPs), which are empirically derived, for its calculation. The objective was to examine if DSPs based on data pooled from several countries could increase accuracy, precision, utility, and international comparability of DSPs and ICISS. METHODS: Australia, Argentina, Austria, Canada, Denmark, New Zealand, and Sweden provided ICD-10-coded injury hospital discharge data, including in-hospital mortality status. Data from the seven countries were pooled using four different methods to create an international collaborative effort ICISS (ICE-ICISS). The ability of the ICISS to predict mortality using the country-specific DSPs and the pooled DSPs was estimated and compared. RESULTS: The pooled DSPs were based on a total of 3,966,550 observations of injury diagnoses from the seven countries. The proportion of injury diagnoses having at least 100 discharges to calculate the DSP varied from 12% to 48% in the country-specific data set and was 66% in the pooled data set. When compared with using a country's own DSPs for ICISS calculation, the pooled DSPs resulted in somewhat reduced discrimination in predicting mortality (difference in c statistic varied from 0.006 to 0.04). Calibration was generally good when the predicted mortality risk was less than 20%. When Danish and Swedish data were used, ICISS was combined with age and sex in a logistic regression model to predict in-hospital mortality. Including age and sex improved both discrimination and calibration substantially, and the differences from using country-specific or pooled DSPs were minor. CONCLUSION: Pooling data from seven countries generated empirically derived DSPs. These pooled DSPs facilitate international comparisons and enables the use of ICISS in all settings where ICD-10 hospital discharge diagnoses are available. The modest reduction in performance of the ICE-ICISS compared with the country-specific scores is unlikely to outweigh the benefit of internationally comparable Injury Severity Scores possible with pooled data.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 76, no 2, 358-365 p.
Keyword [en]
Trauma, injury, trauma severity indices, population surveillance, hospital mortality
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-227948DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182a9cd31ISI: 000336386100015OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-227948DiVA: diva2:732997
Available from: 2014-07-07 Created: 2014-07-02 Last updated: 2014-07-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gedeborg, Rolf
By organisation
Anaesthesiology and Intensive CareUCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 262 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link