uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Relativism and Uncertainty: A Response to Lukes and Riggio
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology.
2014 (English)In: Social Epistemology, ISSN 0269-1728, E-ISSN 1464-5297, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, Vol. 3, no 7, 10-15 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A  new epistemology − or a mindset through which to see truth and knowledge in a particular light − has emerged and is increasingly shaping the worldview of people in the West. (And perhaps we should not, as Steven Lukes suggests, limit it to the West.) A fundamental shift in epistemology is taking place in today’s society. An appropriate name for this new folk epistemology is disputed, as is its content and, of course, the question of whether or not it is a desirable development. 

In “Relativism — a Pervasive Feature of the Contemporary Western World,” I named it relativism and argued that what is new is not strictly speaking its content, but rather is the extension of the viewpoint: more and more people nowadays think that the scope of what is relative is significantly greaterthan what had previously been commonly thought. There is a growing suspicion that, when it comes to morality, religion, knowledge, truth and science, what we had earlier thought to be fixed and universal is actually malleable and local, and is dependent on human interest, gender, class, ethnicity, culture, or worldview. Steven Lukes and Adam Riggio seem to agree, and also to find my conception of relativism illuminating and useful, but they raise some interesting and challenging questions to which I shall try to respond.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 3, no 7, 10-15 p.
Keyword [en]
relativism, truth, morality
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Research subject
Philosophy of Religion
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-230302OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-230302DiVA: diva2:739861
Projects
Impact of religion
Note

The articles is located in "Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective" of the journal Social Epistemology

Available from: 2014-08-22 Created: 2014-08-22 Last updated: 2017-12-05

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Stenmark, Mikael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenmark, Mikael
By organisation
Department of Theology
In the same journal
Social Epistemology
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 435 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf