uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intrinsicalism and Conditionalism about Final Value
Uppsala University, Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
2004 (English)In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, ISSN 1386-2820, Vol. 7, no 1, 31-52 p.Article in journal (Other scientific) Published
Abstract [en]

The paper distinguishes between two rival views about the nature of final value (i.e. the value something has for its own sake) – intrinsicalism and conditionalism. The former view (which is the one adopted by G. E. Moore and several later writers) holds that the final value of any F supervenes solely on features intrinsic to F, while the latter view allows that the final value of F may supervene on features non-intrinsic to F. Conditionalism thus allows the final value of F to vary according to the context in which F appears. Given the plausible assumption that there is an intimate tie between final values and appropriate attitudinal responses, it appears that conditionalism is the better approach for mainly the following three reasons: First, intrinsicalism is too indiscriminate, which makes it subject to what I call ‘location problems’ of final value. I illustrate this problem by discussing alleged examples of Moorean organic unities. Second, intrinsicalism evokes symptoms of ‘evaluative schizophrenia’. Third, considerations of theoretical economy tell in favour of conditionalism. Thereafter I respond to some recent challenges to conditionalism. An appendix surveys some meritorious implications that conditionalism offers for various substantial versions of such structurally different views about value as monism, pluralism, and particularism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 7, no 1, 31-52 p.
Keyword [en]
"Conditionalism", "final value", "G.E. Moore", "organic unities", "pain", "pleasure", "supervenience"
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-46600OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-46600DiVA: diva2:74507
Available from: 2005-04-21 Created: 2005-04-21 Last updated: 2011-01-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Olson, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olson, Jonas
By organisation
Department of Philosophy
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 345 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf