uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Skriftpraktiker, diskursiva praktiker och analytisk konsekvens
Lunds universitet.
2013 (Swedish)In: Språk & Stil, ISSN 1101-1165, Vol. 23, 85-106 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Literacy practice and discursive practice are two distinct concepts, belonging to different research traditions (new literacy studies, NLS, and critical discourse analysis, CDA). This article is an effort to enlighten the discussion of these concepts by comparing the history and scope of the concepts, the research interest and the different research methods used. Exemplifying with an analysis of 18th century political debate and an analysis of a graphic profile manual from the right-wing party in Sweden from 2010, the analytical consequences of focusing on the literacy practice or the discursive practice are demonstrated.

Sometimes the assumption is made that CDA has a static concept of context and is less interested in the dynamics of practices involving texts. But the analysis of discursive practices involves analysis of the dynamic processes of meaning construction and mediation of discourse, of production, consumption and interpretation of texts as well as effects of discursive strategies. The analysis of literacy practice on the other hand is interested in dynamic processes affecting the literacy event, processes of text handling, attitudes towards and conversations about texts. There is a difference in methods as well as in research focus and the point is made that the analysis of discursive practices in CDA must necessarily involve linguistic analysis, while in NLS, linguistic analysis is complementary, not part of the analysis of literacy practices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 23, 85-106 p.
Keyword [en]
literacy practice, discursive practice, context, discourse, political texts, Swedish
National Category
Languages and Literature
Research subject
Scandinavian Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-232385OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-232385DiVA: diva2:747822
Available from: 2014-09-17 Created: 2014-09-17 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(288 kB)126 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 288 kBChecksum SHA-512
c1ba47aa460c17fb42fa4b10ebd7f9102e352683d8ad39994032115f8d6076423a293e4e76c5343b5d85bfa1c4067ea7be4d0671375d1de9dcdedf100d0a5d99
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

In the same journal
Språk & Stil
Languages and Literature

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 126 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 962 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf