Strategies of Deliberation: Bourdieu and Struggles over Legitimate Positions
2015 (Swedish)In: Political Studies, ISSN 0032-3217, E-ISSN 1467-9248, Vol. 63, no 5, 1103-1119 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Bourdieusian contributions to the discourse on deliberative democracy have recently proved issues of ‘deliberativeinequality’ to be more complicated than previously imagined. Some have come to question the desirability orsufficiency of deliberative forms of politics. Others, like James Bohman, have found Bourdieu’s theorizing lacking theconception of people’s reflexive capacities required to understand social and political change. Critics and defendersof deliberative politics alike place Bourdieu in opposition to deliberation. In contrast, this article argues that Bourdieuprovides, through the concepts investment, field and symbolic capital, an alternative vision of deliberative change. Thisalternative view bases strategies for change on investment in social fields, in which agents work for the expansion ofnorms that allow them to make legitimate claims. Empirical findings from the literature on participatory budgetingsupport the argument that the Bourdieusian view is highly relevant to debates about the transformative potential of‘mini-publics’ in deliberative systems.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015. Vol. 63, no 5, 1103-1119 p.
deliberative democracy, Bourdieu, equality, public sphere, marginalization
Research subject Political Science
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-232412DOI: 10.1111/1467-9248.12139ISI: 000368235700008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-232412DiVA: diva2:747910