uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Ambulatory blood pressure adds little to Framingham Risk Score for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in older men: secondary analysis of observational study data
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Cardiology. Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Medicinska och farmaceutiska vetenskapsområdet, centrumbildningar mm, UCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2247-8454
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 4, no 9, e006044- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To determine the incremental value of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in predicting cardiovascular risk when the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) is known. Methods: We included 780 men without cardiovascular disease from the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men, all aged approximately 70 years at baseline. We first screened ambulatory systolic BP (ASBP) parameters for their incremental value by adding them to a model with 10-year FRS. For the best ASBP parameter we estimated HRs and changes in discrimination, calibration and reclassification. We also estimated the difference in the number of men started on treatment and in the number of men protected against a cardiovascular event. Results: Mean daytime ASBP had the highest incremental value; adding other parameters did not yield further improvements. While ASBP was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease, addition to FRS led to only small increases to the overall model fit, discrimination (a 1% increase in the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve), calibration and reclassification. We estimated that for every 10 000 men screened with ASBP, 141 fewer would start a new BP-lowering treatment (95% CI 62 to 220 less treated), but this would result in 7 fewer cardiovascular events prevented over the subsequent 10 years (95% CI 21 fewer events prevented to 7 more events prevented). Conclusions: In addition to a standard cardiovascular risk assessment it is not clear that ambulatory BP measurement provides further incremental value. The clinical role of ambulatory BP requires ongoing careful consideration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 4, no 9, e006044- p.
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-235207DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006044ISI: 000341640400007PubMedID: 25200562OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-235207DiVA: diva2:759398
Available from: 2014-10-29 Created: 2014-10-29 Last updated: 2016-01-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2075 kB)47 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2075 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundström, Johan
By organisation
CardiologyUCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 47 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 240 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link