uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Remarkable Viscoelasticity in Mixtures of Cyclodextrins and Nonionic Surfactants
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Chemistry, Department of Chemistry - BMC, Analytical Chemistry.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Langmuir, ISSN 0743-7463, E-ISSN 1520-5827, Vol. 30, no 39, 11552-11562 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We report the effect of native cyclodextrins (alpha, beta, and gamma) and selected derivatives in modulating the self-assembly of the nonionic surfactant polyoxyethylene cholesteryl ether (ChEO(10)) and its mixtures with triethylene glycol monododecyl ether (C12EO3), which form wormlike micelles. Cyclodextrins (CDs) generally induce micellar breakup through a host-guest interaction with surfactants; instead, we show that a constructive effect, leading to gel formation, is obtained with specific CDs and that the widely invoked host-guest interaction may not be the only key to the association. When added to wormlike micelles of ChEO(10) and C12EO3, native beta-CD, 2-hydroxyethyl-beta-CD (HEBCD), and a sulfated sodium salt of beta-CD (SULFBCD) induce a substantial increase of the viscoelasticity, while methylated CDs rupture the micelles, leading to a loss of the viscosity, and the other CDs studied (native alpha- and gamma- and hydroxypropylated CDs) show a weak interaction. Most remarkably, the addition of HEBCD or SULFBCD to pure ChEO(10) solutions (which are low-viscosity, Newtonian fluids of small, ellipsoidal micelles) induces the formation of transparent gels. The combination of small-angle neutron scattering, dynamic light scattering, and cryo-TEM reveals that both CDs drive the elongation of ChEO(10) aggregates into an entangled network of wormlike micelles. H-1 NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy demonstrate the formation of inclusion complexes between ChEO(10) and methylated CDs, consistent with the demicellization observed. Instead, HEBCD forms a weak complex with ChEO(10), while no complex is detected with SULFBCD. This shows that inclusion complex formation is not the determinant event leading to micellar growth. HEBCD:ChEO(10) complex, which coexists with the aggregated surfactant, could act as a cosurfactant with a different headgroup area. For SULFBCD, intermolecular interactions via the external surface of the CD may be more relevant.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 30, no 39, 11552-11562 p.
National Category
Chemical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-236539DOI: 10.1021/la503000zISI: 000343017600008PubMedID: 25201697OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-236539DiVA: diva2:766349
Available from: 2014-11-26 Created: 2014-11-19 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

da Silva, Marcelo A.Eriksson, JonnyGonzalez-Gaitano, Gustavo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
da Silva, Marcelo A.Eriksson, JonnyGonzalez-Gaitano, Gustavo
By organisation
Analytical Chemistry
In the same journal
Langmuir
Chemical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 792 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf