uu.seUppsala University Publications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Unification or Fragmentation?: Structural Tendencies in International Criminal Procedure
Stockholms universitet, Juridiska institutionen.
2012 (English)In: The Diversification and Fragmentation of International Criminal Law / [ed] Larissa van den Herik; Carsten Stahn, Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers , 2012, 593-631 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

International criminal tribunals and courts all represent procedural hybrids with tensions between adversarial and inquisitorial influences. Any effort to establish a universal code of procedural law governing international trials is met with great difficulties. Part of the explanation is that international criminal procedure, as all other branches of law, is subject to competing objectives. The aim of this article is to examine tensions between objectives in international criminal procedure and suggest an approach that may guide courts in their adjudication of hard cases. A hard case concerns a concrete legal issue and is at hand when it is uncertain whether it should be subsumed by a legal rule.

This article examines which appraisals of objectives can be made to arrive to certain solutions and whether a method of general applicability is available. Are the objectives the same for various procedural matters? Does the balance between different objectives differ between various procedural matters? Is it possible to justify different solutions with reference to one or several objectives? In other words, can we find a universally acceptable hierarchy of objectives? The aspiration is to outline a web of various objectives, reflected in legislation, case law and offer the practitioner a useful perspective when confronted with a procedural matter.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers , 2012. 593-631 p.
Series
Leiden Studies on the Frontiers of International Law, ISSN 2212-4195 ; 1
Keyword [en]
International criminal procedure, fragmentation, differentiated functional approach
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-209352ISBN: 978-90-04-21459-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-209352DiVA: diva2:766779
Available from: 2012-12-17 Created: 2013-10-17 Last updated: 2014-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Klamberg, Mark

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Klamberg, Mark
Law and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 361 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf